UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025

OR

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 001-39163

Hess Midstream LP

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code, is (832) 854-1000)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by checkmark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. Yes ☒ No ☐

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

The aggregate market value of Class A shares held by non‑affiliates of the registrant amounts to $5.0 billion, computed using the outstanding Class A shares and closing market price on June 30, 2025, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

129,403,244 Class A shares representing limited partner interests in the registrant were outstanding as of February 18, 2026.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K, including information incorporated by reference herein, contains “forward-looking statements.” Words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “guidance,” “drive,” “could,” “may,” “should,” “would,” “enable,” “believe,” “intend,” “focus,” “potential,” “project,” “plan,” “trend,” “predict,” “will,” “target,” “opportunity” and similar expressions, and variations or negatives of these words, are intended to identify forward-looking statements, but not all forward-looking statements include such words.

Forward-looking statements relating to the Company’s operations, assets, and strategy are based on management’s current expectations, assessments, estimates, projections and assumptions about the industry. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to numerous risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond the Company’s control and difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from our current projections or expectations of future results expressed or forecasted by these forward-looking statements. Among the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in our forward-looking statements are:

Other unpredictable or unknown factors not discussed in this Annual Report could also cause actual results to differ materially from those in our forward-looking statements. Caution should be taken not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements since such statements speak only as of the date of this report. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether because of new information, future events or otherwise.

Unless otherwise stated or the context otherwise indicates, references in this report to “Hess Midstream Operations LP,” the “Partnership,” “us,” “we,” “our” or similar terms, when referring to periods between April 10, 2017 and December 16, 2019, refer to Hess Midstream Operations LP (formerly known as Hess Midstream Partners LP, the predecessor registrant to Hess Midstream LP), including its consolidated subsidiaries. All references to “Hess Midstream LP,” the “Company,” “us,” “our,” “we” or similar terms, when referring to periods subsequent to December 16, 2019, refer to Hess Midstream LP and its consolidated subsidiaries. References to “Sponsor” or “Sponsors” refer to (a) Hess and GIP II Blue Holding, L.P. (“GIP”) when referring to periods prior to May 30, 2025, (b) Hess from May 30, 2025 to July 17, 2025, and (c) Chevron from July 18, 2025.

As used in this report, the term “Chevron” may refer to Chevron Corporation, one or more of its consolidated subsidiaries, or to all of them taken as a whole. All of these terms are used for convenience only and are not intended as a precise description of any of the separate companies, each of which manages its own affairs.

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

Throughout this report, the following company or industry specific terms and abbreviations are used:

Barrel: One stock tank barrel, or 42 U.S. gallons liquid volume, used in reference to crude oil or other liquid hydrocarbons.

Bbl(s): Barrel(s).

Bbl/d: Barrels per day.

Btu: One British thermal unit—a measure of the amount of energy required to raise the temperature of a one‑pound mass of water one degree Fahrenheit at sea level.

Cf: Cubic foot or feet is a common unit of gas measurement. One standard cubic foot equals the volume of gas in one cubic foot measured at standard temperature (60 degrees Fahrenheit) and standard pressure (14.73 pounds standard per square inch).

CNG: Compressed natural gas.

Crude oil: A mixture of hydrocarbons that exists in liquid phase in underground reservoirs.

Fractionation: Fractionation is accomplished by controlling the temperature and pressure of the stream of mixed NGL in order to take advantage of the different boiling points of separate components. NGL fractionation facilities separate mixed NGL streams into discrete components such as ethane, propane, normal butane, isobutane and natural gasoline.

Liquefied petroleum gas: A mixture of hydrocarbon gases commonly used as a fuel, including propane and butane.

MBbl: One thousand barrels.

MBbl/d: One thousand barrels per day.

Mcf: One thousand cubic feet.

Mdge/d: One thousand diesel gallons equivalent per day.

Mgal/d: One thousand gallons per day.

MMcf/d: One million cubic feet per day.

MVC: Minimum volume commitment.

NGL: Natural gas liquids, which are the hydrocarbon liquids contained within natural gas.

Psi: Pounds per square inch.

Psig: Pounds per square inch gauge.

Throughput: The volume of crude oil, natural gas, NGLs, water and refined petroleum products transported or passing through a pipeline, plant, terminal or other facility during a particular period.

Williston Basin: One of the largest structural-sedimentary basins in North America, spanning across North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Saskatchewan and Manitoba, with a surface area of approximately 143,000 square miles within the United States and multiple petroleum reservoirs.

Y‑grade: A classification used to describe the extent to which certain hydrocarbons can be stored at a specified pressure, making the hydrocarbon easier to move in a liquid state.

PART I

ITEMS 1 and 2. BUSINESS AND PROPERTIES

Overview

We are a fee-based, growth-oriented, limited partnership that owns, operates, develops and acquires a diverse set of midstream assets and provides fee-based services to Chevron, its subsidiaries, and third-party customers. Our assets are primarily located in the Bakken and Three Forks shale plays in the Williston Basin area of North Dakota, which we collectively refer to as the Bakken and which is one of the most prolific crude oil producing basins in North America. Our Sponsor dedicated substantially all of its existing and future owned or controlled production in the Bakken under our long-term, fee-based agreements and intends to use us as the primary midstream vehicle to support its production goals in the Bakken and preserve value of its midstream business. We generate substantially all of our revenues by charging fees for gathering, compressing and processing natural gas and fractionating NGLs; gathering, terminaling, loading and transporting crude oil and NGLs; storing and terminaling propane; and gathering and disposing of produced water.

Prior to December 16, 2019, we were indirectly controlled by Hess Infrastructure Partners GP LLC, the general partner of Hess Infrastructure Partners LP (“HIP”). HIP was originally formed in 2015 as a 50/50 joint venture between Hess and GIP. On April 10, 2017, we completed an initial public offering (“IPO”) as a master limited partnership, pursuant to which HIP contributed to the Partnership a 20% controlling economic interest in each of (i) Hess North Dakota Pipelines Operations LP; (ii) Hess TGP Operations LP; and (iii) Hess North Dakota Export Logistics Operations LP (collectively, the “Joint Interest Assets”) and a 100% interest in Hess Mentor Storage Holdings LLC. HIP owned the remaining 80% economic interest in the Joint Interest Assets, a 100% interest in certain other businesses, including Hess’ Bakken water services business (“Hess Water Services”), which it acquired from Hess on March 1, 2019, and a 100% interest in Hess Midstream Partners GP LP, which held all of the Partnership’s outstanding incentive distribution rights and the general partner interest in the Partnership, and controlled the Partnership.

On December 16, 2019, the Company and the Partnership completed the transactions (the “Restructuring”) contemplated by the Partnership Restructuring Agreement, dated October 3, 2019, by and among the Company, the Partnership and the other parties thereto. Pursuant to the Restructuring, the Partnership acquired HIP, including HIP’s 80% interest in the Joint Interest Assets, 100% interest in Hess Water Services and the outstanding economic general partner interest and incentive distribution rights in the Partnership. The Partnership’s organizational structure converted from a master limited partnership into an “Up-C” structure, in which the Partnership’s public unitholders received newly issued Class A Shares in the Company in a one-for-one exchange. Class A Shares commenced trading on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the former symbol “HESM” on December 17, 2019. As a result of the Restructuring, the Company was delegated control of the Partnership and replaced the Partnership as its publicly traded successor. The Partnership changed its name to “Hess Midstream Operations LP” and became a consolidated subsidiary of the Company.

On May 30, 2025, GIP sold all of its limited partner interests in the Partnership and no longer holds a direct or indirect ownership interest in the Company, the Partnership or our general partner.

On July 18, 2025, Hess and Chevron completed the previously announced merger contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated October 22, 2023 (the “Merger”). As a result of the Merger, Chevron is the direct parent of Hess and, therefore, indirectly owns each of the following:

Throughout this filing and depending on the context, we make references to Chevron, as Chevron, following the completion of the Merger, is our Sponsor and indirectly wholly owns our general partner and, through its ownership of our general partner, has the indirect right to appoint all of the members of our board of directors. Our historical commercial, omnibus and employee secondment agreements with Hess remain in effect subsequent to the Merger, and we refer to Chevron as the counterparty to these agreements, as Chevron currently wholly owns the Hess entities that are counterparties to these agreements.

At December 31, 2025:

See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. Note 3, Equity Transactions and Note 8, Partners’ Capital and Distributions for further details.

LM4 Joint Venture

On January 25, 2018, we entered into a 50/50 joint venture with Targa Resources Corp. (“Targa”) to construct a new 200 MMcf/d gas processing plant called Little Missouri 4 (“LM4”). LM4 was placed in service in 2019. Targa is the operator of the plant.

Operating Segments

We conduct our business through three operating segments: (i) gathering, (ii) processing and storage and (iii) terminaling and export. See Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for further details.

Organizational Structure

The following chart summarizes our corporate structure at December 31, 2025.

Our Business and Properties

Gathering

Our gathering business consists of the Partnership’s 100% interest in (i) Hess North Dakota Pipelines Operations LP (“Gathering Opco”), which owns our North Dakota natural gas, NGL and crude oil gathering systems, and (ii) Hess Water Services, which owns our produced water gathering and disposal facilities. The following sections describe in more detail these assets and the related services that we provide.

Natural Gas Gathering and Compression

A natural gas gathering and compression system located primarily in McKenzie, Williams and Mountrail Counties, North Dakota, connecting Chevron and third‑party owned or operated wells to the Tioga Gas Plant, the LM4 plant, and third‑party pipeline facilities. This gathering system consists of approximately 1,430 miles of high and low pressure natural gas and NGL gathering pipelines with a current capacity of up to approximately 685 MMcf/d. The system has an aggregate compression capacity of approximately 550 MMcf/d, including approximately 20 MMcf/d of net compression capacity added in 2025. Construction was also completed on an additional greenfield compressor station, which was placed in service in early 2026 and which further increased compression capacity by approximately 50 MMcf/d in 2026. The compressed gas and mixed NGLs are transported to the Tioga Gas Plant and the LM4 plant either as separate or combined streams for processing. Our gathering system capacity can be increased via installation of additional compression equipment.

Crude Oil Gathering

A crude oil gathering system located primarily in McKenzie, Williams and Mountrail Counties, North Dakota, connecting Chevron and third‑party owned or operated wells to the Ramberg Terminal Facility, the Tioga Rail Terminal and the Johnson’s Corner Header System. The crude oil gathering system consists of approximately 615 miles of crude oil gathering pipelines with a current capacity of up to approximately 290 MBbl/d.

Included within our crude oil gathering system is our Hawkeye Oil Facility, which is a crude oil pumping and truck unloading facility located in McKenzie County, North Dakota. The Hawkeye Oil Facility entered into service in 2017. The facility receives crude oil through pipeline and truck deliveries from Chevron and third parties and transports it by pipeline to the Johnson’s Corner Header System. Total receipt capacity of the facility is approximately 75 MBbl/d, which can be filled solely through our crude oil gathering system or through a combination of our crude oil gathering system and truck unloading bays. The facility has six truck unloading bays with an aggregate capacity of approximately 30 MBbl/d. The facility has a redelivery capability of approximately 75 MBbl/d through a pipeline system connected to our crude oil export terminals. The facility also has two crude oil storage tanks with a combined working storage capacity of approximately 10 MBbls. Our gathering system capacity can be increased through the installation of additional pumping equipment.

Produced Water Gathering and Disposal

A produced water gathering system located primarily in Williams and Mountrail counties, North Dakota, that transports produced water from well sites by approximately 360 miles of pipelines in gathering systems or by third-party trucking to water handling facilities for disposal. As of December 31, 2025, we had 13 water handling and disposal facilities in service, with a combined permitted disposal capacity of 185 MBbl/d. These water handling and disposal facilities are owned and operated by Hess Water Services and primarily service the water pipeline gathering systems. We also transport produced water to 13 water handling and disposal facilities operated by third parties that have a combined permitted disposal capacity of approximately 180 MBbl/d.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our gathering assets, which operate under long‑term, fee‑based commercial agreements with Chevron:

Gathering Assets

(1) Includes 75 MBbl/d of capacity at the Hawkeye Oil Facility.

Processing and Storage

Our processing and storage business consists of (i) the Partnership’s 100% interest in Hess TGP Operations LP (“HTGP Opco”), which owns the Tioga Gas Plant, (ii) the Partnership’s 50% interest in the LM4 gas processing plant operated by Targa, and (iii) the Partnership’s 100% interest in Hess Mentor Storage Holdings LLC (“Mentor Holdings”), which owns the Mentor Storage Terminal. The following sections describe in more detail these assets and the related services that we provide.

Tioga Gas Plant

The Tioga Gas Plant (“TGP”), which is located in Tioga, North Dakota, has a total processing capacity of 400 MMcf/d making it one of the largest natural gas processing and fractionation plants in North Dakota. The plant consists of (i) a state-of-the-art cryogenic processing facility with ethane extraction capabilities that produces low Btu, pipeline‑quality natural gas, (ii) a 60 MBbl/d fractionation facility with NGL fractionation capabilities for ethane, propane, butane and natural gasoline and (iii) 25 MBbl/d of stabilized y-grade liquid recovery capabilities. The plant receives natural gas produced from Chevron‑operated and third‑party operated wells in the Bakken through our North Dakota gathering systems as well as third‑party gathering systems.

TGP was initially constructed in 1954. It subsequently underwent a large‑scale expansion, refurbishment and optimization project that was completed in 2014, during which a new cryogenic processing train with a nameplate processing capacity of 250 MMcf/d was installed. In 2021, the TGP de-bottlenecking project was completed and commissioned, increasing total plant processing to 400 MMcf/d and adding y-grade liquids recovery of up to approximately 25 MBbl/d.

TGP has a multitude of residue gas and NGL export options. For residue gas, the plant has total export capacity of more than 250 MMcf/d with access to the Chicago, IL market through the Alliance Pipeline from the Tioga lateral; it also has access to the Ventura, IA market through the Northern Border Pipeline from the WBI North Bakken Expansion Pipeline. TGP also provides residue gas for local and regional uses through the WBI system and for gas lift and fuel through the North Dakota Natural Gas Pipeline, which also interconnects with the Northern Border pipeline. For ethane, TGP can recover and ship up to 30 MBbl/d of ethane to Canada on the Vantage Pipeline. Other fractionated products such as propane, butane and natural gasoline can be shipped via truck or rail to local and regional markets. Y-grade liquids are shipped on the Elk Creek Pipeline from the ONEOK NGL lateral to Bushton, KS with access to Mont Belvieu, TX.

The plant also includes four NGL truck loading racks with an aggregate loading capacity of approximately 10 MBbl/d of propane to serve the local propane market, as well as 14 NGL bullet storage tanks and 5 NGL storage tanks with a combined shell capacity of approximately 35 MBbls of propane, 10 MBbls of butane and 35 MBbls of natural gasoline. The total NGL production capability of the plant is approximately 80 MBbl/d, with interconnections into the Vantage Pipeline, the Alliance Pipeline and interconnecting pipelines with our Tioga Rail Terminal. Additionally, the plant includes a CNG terminal that is capable of compressing approximately 5.6 MMcf/d of natural gas to 3,600 psig and loading in excess of 100 light duty CNG‑fueled vehicles and up to 32 CNG cylinder trailers per day for drilling and hydraulic fracturing operations, for a combined capacity of approximately 40 Mdge/d.

LM4

The Partnership owns a 50% interest in a joint venture with Targa, which constructed and placed in service in the third quarter of 2019, a new 200 MMcf/d gas processing plant called Little Missouri 4, or LM4, located at Targa’s existing Little Missouri facility, south of the Missouri River in McKenzie County, North Dakota. We are entitled to 100 MMcf/d of the plant’s processing capacity. The plant receives natural gas produced from Chevron-operated and third-party operated wells in the Bakken through our gathering systems as well as third-party gathering systems. The plant also has direct residue gas and NGL pipeline connections at the tailgate of the plant, with export capacity of approximately 135 MMcf/d of natural gas to the Northern Border Interstate Pipeline and 40 MBbl/d of NGLs to ONEOK Elk Creek Pipeline.

Mentor Storage Terminal

Our Mentor Storage Terminal consists of a propane storage cavern and a rail and truck loading and unloading facility located on approximately 40 acres in Mentor, Minnesota. The Mentor Storage Terminal has an aggregate working storage capacity of approximately 330 MBbls, consisting of an underground cavern with a working storage capacity of approximately 325 MBbls and three above‑ground bullet storage tanks with an aggregate working storage capacity of approximately 5 MBbls. The terminal also has a dehydration facility, 11 rail unloading racks and two truck loading racks. The cavern and truck loading racks each have a propane injection and withdrawal capacity of approximately 6 MBbl/d.

The Mentor Storage Terminal, a mined cavern for liquefied petroleum gas, was constructed in 1962. The rock from which the cavern was constructed is classified as zoisite, a rare, marble‑like rock that has essentially no porosity or permeability, which makes it excellent for the purpose of liquid hydrocarbon storage. Constant underground temperature provides uniform operating conditions in the cavern.

Propane is received at the Mentor Storage Terminal by rail, and shipments and deliveries vary by season. Chevron utilizes our propane storage services to mitigate the impact on its operations from seasonal variations in the demand for propane. As a result, at Chevron’s direction, we generally fill the cavern with propane during the warmer months when demand for propane is low, and gradually withdraw propane from the cavern during colder months when demand is higher.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our processing and storage assets, which operate under long‑term, fee‑based commercial agreements with Chevron:

Processing and Storage Assets

Terminaling and Export

Our terminaling and export business consists of the Partnership’s 100% interest in Hess North Dakota Export Logistics Operations LP (“Logistics Opco”), which owns the Ramberg Terminal Facility, the Tioga Rail Terminal, our crude oil rail cars, the Johnson’s Corner Header System and various connections into the Dakota Access Pipeline (“DAPL”). The following sections describe in more detail these assets and the related services that we provide.

Ramberg Terminal Facility

Our Ramberg Terminal Facility is a crude oil pipeline and truck unloading facility located in Williams County, North Dakota that receives crude oil by pipeline and truck from Chevron and third parties and exports crude oil by transporting it by pipeline to our Tioga Rail Terminal for loading onto crude oil rail cars or by injecting it directly into DAPL and other third‑party interstate pipeline systems. The facility has a combined pipeline and truck receipt capability of approximately 200 MBbl/d. Up to approximately 130 MBbl/d of crude oil can enter the facility through our crude oil gathering system. Crude oil can also enter the facility through truck unloading bays with a combined truck unloading capacity of approximately 70 MBbl/d.

The facility has a redelivery capability of up to approximately 285 MBbl/d through the following pipelines:

The Ramberg Terminal Facility was constructed in 2006 and expanded in 2016. The facility has a combined shell storage capacity of approximately 40 MBbls, with an additional combined 240 MBbls of storage capacity with third parties.

Tioga Rail Terminal

The Tioga Rail Terminal is a 140 MBbl/d crude oil and 30 MBbl/d NGL rail loading terminal in Tioga, North Dakota that is connected to the Tioga Gas Plant, the Ramberg Terminal Facility and our crude oil gathering system.

The approximate 140 MBbl/d crude oil loading facility includes a dual loop track with 21 crude oil loading arms that commenced service in 2011. The terminal loads crude oil rail cars owned by us and third parties. The terminal also has three crude oil storage tanks with a combined shell storage capacity of approximately 290 MBbls. The terminal receives up to 30 MBbl/d of crude oil directly from a 14‑inch crude oil pipeline connected to, and included as part of, our Ramberg Terminal Facility.

The terminal is capable of loading crude oil unit trains, which are dedicated trains (typically ranging from approximately 100 to 110 cars) chartered for a single delivery destination that usually receive priority scheduling and result in a more cost‑effective method of shipping than standard rail shipment.

The terminal is capable of receiving up to 30 MBbl/d of NGLs through three NGL pipelines connected to the Tioga Gas Plant, including: (i) an eight‑inch propane pipeline with a capacity of approximately 35 MBbl/d; (ii) a six‑inch butane pipeline with a capacity of approximately 15 MBbl/d; and (iii) a six‑inch mixed NGL pipeline with a capacity of approximately 10 MBbl/d. The terminal also includes separate ladder tracks with track space for over 385 NGL rail cars and 16 NGL loading arms. The NGL rail cars are leased by Chevron and third parties.

The terminal has a direct rail connection to the BNSF Railway, which in turn connects to the Union Pacific, CSX, Norfolk Southern and other Class 1 railroads. Crude oil loaded onto rail cars at the terminal may be transported to various delivery points in the East Coast, West Coast and Gulf Coast regions of the United States. The terminal receives NGLs for loading onto rail cars for transportation to various delivery points in North America.

Crude Oil Rail Cars

We own a total of 550 crude oil rail cars, which we operate as unit trains consisting of approximately 100 to 110 crude oil rail cars, with which we provide crude oil transportation services to Chevron or third parties from the Tioga Rail Terminal to various delivery points in the East Coast, West Coast and Gulf Coast regions of the United States. Our crude oil rail cars were constructed between April 2015 and October 2015 to DOT‑117 safety standards. The effective capacity of the crude oil rail cars depends on round‑trip times to destination. For the year ended December 31, 2025, the average round‑trip duration was approximately 11 days and, based on this, the aggregate working capacity of our crude oil rail cars was approximately 32 MBbl/d. Our crude oil rail cars have a shell capacity of 728 Bbls per car and an effective loading capacity of approximately 92%, or approximately 670 Bbls per car.

Johnson’s Corner Header System

The Johnson’s Corner Header System is a crude oil pipeline header system located in McKenzie County, North Dakota that receives crude oil by pipeline from Chevron and third parties and delivers crude oil to DAPL and other third‑party interstate pipeline systems. It has a delivery capacity of approximately 100 MBbl/d of crude oil. The Johnson’s Corner Header System entered into service in 2017.

Other DAPL Connections

In addition to the connections at the Ramberg Terminal Facility and the Johnson’s Corner Header System, we also have other DAPL connections, which are crude oil delivery points within our terminal system located in Williams and Mountrail Counties, North Dakota that receive crude oil by pipeline from our crude oil gathering system for delivery into DAPL.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our terminaling and export assets, which operate under a long‑term, fee‑based commercial agreement with Chevron:

Terminaling and Export Assets

Our Commercial Agreements with Chevron

We have long-term fee-based commercial agreements with certain subsidiaries of Chevron to provide (i) gas gathering, (ii) crude oil gathering, (iii) gas processing and fractionation, (iv) storage services, (v) terminaling and export services, and (vi) water handling services.

For the services performed under these commercial agreements, we receive a fee per barrel of crude oil, barrel of water, Mcf of natural gas, or Mcf equivalent of NGLs, as applicable, delivered during each month, and Chevron is obligated to provide us with minimum volumes of crude oil, water, natural gas and NGLs. Minimum volume commitments (“MVCs”) are equal to 80% of Chevron’s nominations in each development plan and apply on a three-year rolling basis such that MVCs are set for the three years following the most recent nomination. Without our consent, the MVCs resulting from the nominated volumes for any quarter or year contained in any prior development plan cannot be reduced by any updated development plan unless dedicated production is released by us. The applicable MVCs may, however, be increased as a result of the nominations contained in any such updated development plan. If Chevron fails to deliver its applicable MVCs during any quarter, then Chevron will pay us a shortfall fee equal to the volume of the deficiency multiplied by the applicable fee.

Except for the water services agreements and except for a certain gathering sub-system as described below, each of our commercial agreements with Chevron had an initial 10-year term effective January 1, 2014 (“Initial Term”). For this gathering sub-system, the Initial Term is 15 years effective January 1, 2014, and for the water services agreements the Initial Term is 14 years effective January 1, 2019. Each of our commercial agreements other than our storage services agreement includes an inflation escalator capped at 3% in any calendar year and a fee recalculation mechanism that allows fees to be adjusted annually during the Initial Term for updated estimates of cumulative throughput volumes and our capital and operating expenditures in order to target a return on capital deployed over the Initial Term of the applicable commercial agreement (or, with respect to the crude oil services fee under our terminal and export services agreement, the 20-year period commencing on the effective date of the agreement).

For certain crude oil gathering, terminaling, storage, gas processing and gas gathering commercial agreements with Chevron, we exercised our renewal options to extend each of these commercial agreements for one additional 10-year term (“Secondary Term”) effective January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2033. There were no changes to any provisions of the existing commercial agreements as a result of the exercise of the renewal options. For the remaining gathering sub-system, the Secondary Term is 5 years, and for the water services agreements the Secondary Term is 10 years, and we have the sole option to renew these remaining agreements for their Secondary Term that is exercisable at a later date. Upon the expiration of the Secondary Term, if any, the agreements will automatically renew for the subsequent one-year periods unless terminated by either party no later than 180 days prior to the end of the applicable Secondary Term.

Consistent with the existing terms of the commercial agreements, during the Secondary Term of each of our commercial agreements other than our storage services agreement and terminal and export services agreement (with respect to crude oil terminaling services), the fee recalculation model under each applicable agreement is replaced by an inflation-based fee structure. The initial fee for the first year of the Secondary Term is determined based on the average fees paid by Chevron under the applicable agreement during the last three years of the Initial Term (with such fees adjusted for inflation through the first year of the Secondary Term). For each year following the first year of the Secondary Term, the applicable fee is adjusted annually based on the percentage change in the consumer price index, provided that we may not increase any fee by more than 3% in any calendar year solely by reason of an increase in the consumer price index, and no fee will ever be reduced below the amount of the applicable fee payable by Chevron in the prior year as a result of a decrease in the consumer price index. During the Secondary Term, MVCs continue to be set at 80% of Chevron’s nominated volumes in each development plan set three years in advance. Except for the crude oil terminaling and water handling services, Chevron is entitled to receive a credit, calculated in barrels or Mcf, as applicable, with respect to the amount of any shortfall fee paid by Chevron and may apply such credit against any volumes delivered to us under the applicable agreement in excess of Chevron’s nominated volumes during any of the following four quarters after such credit is earned, after which time any unused credits will expire. The shortfall amounts received under MVCs during the Secondary Term (except for the crude oil terminaling and water handling services) are recorded as deferred revenue and recognized as revenue as the credits are utilized or expire.

Year 2023 was the final year of the annual rate redetermination process for the majority of our systems. At the end of 2023, the base rate for 2024 was set based on the average of the tariff rates from the years 2021 through 2023, adjusted for inflation, as described above. Rates are now adjusted each year based on an inflation escalator, as described above. For our terminaling and water gathering systems, the rates continue to be reset through our annual rate redetermination process through 2033. For all of our systems, MVCs continue to provide downside protection through 2033.

We believe these commercial agreements provide us with stable and predictable cash flows, an element of downside risk protection and minimal direct exposure to commodity price fluctuations.

The following table sets forth additional information regarding Chevron’s MVCs:

For the year ended December 31, 2025, 97% of our revenues were attributable to our fee‑based commercial agreements with Chevron, including revenues from third‑party volumes delivered under these agreements. Our gas gathering and gas processing revenues comprised 77% of total affiliate revenues, excluding affiliate pass-through revenues. In 2023, we began providing our services directly to third-party customers. Together with Chevron, we are pursuing strategic relationships with third‑party producers and other midstream companies with operations in the Bakken in order to maximize our utilization rates.

Regulation of Our Operations

Environmental Regulation

General

Our operations are subject to extensive and frequently changing federal, state and local laws, regulations and ordinances relating to the protection of the environment. Among other things, these laws and regulations govern the emission or discharge of pollutants into or onto the land, air and water, the handling and disposal of solid and hazardous wastes and the remediation of contamination. As with the industry generally, compliance with existing and anticipated environmental laws and regulations increases our overall cost of business, including our costs to construct, maintain, operate and upgrade equipment and facilities. While these laws and regulations affect our capital expenditures and net income, we believe they do not currently affect our competitive position. However, these laws and regulations are subject to changes, or to changes in the interpretation of such laws and regulations, by regulatory authorities, and continued and future compliance with such laws and regulations may require us to incur significant expenditures. Additionally, noncompliance with environmental laws, regulations and permits can result in the imposition of significant administrative, civil and criminal penalties, injunctions limiting our operations, investigatory or remedial liabilities or bans or delays in the construction of additional facilities or equipment. While we are confident in our compliance with current environmental laws and regulations, we acknowledge the potential for policy shifts that could impact our operations. Since January 20, 2025, President Trump has issued executive orders and memoranda signaling a shift in environmental and energy policy in the United States. While the Trump Administration’s changes to the environmental regulatory landscape in the United States continue to develop, it is possible that additional changes in the future could impact our results of operations and those of our customers.

Furthermore, a release of hydrocarbons or hazardous substances into the environment could, to the extent the event is not insured, subject us to substantial expenses, including costs to clean up and remediate the release, comply with applicable laws and regulations and to resolve claims by third parties for personal injury or property damage, or by the U.S. federal government or state governments for natural resources damages. These impacts could directly and indirectly affect our business and have an adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations and liquidity. We cannot currently determine the amounts of such potential future impacts.

Air Emissions and Climate Change

We are subject to the Clean Air Act and its regulations and comparable state and local statutes and regulations in connection with air emissions from our operations. Under these laws, permits may be required before construction can commence on a new source of potentially significant air emissions, and operating permits may be required for sources that are already constructed. These permits may require controls on our air emission sources, and we may become subject to more stringent regulations requiring the installation of additional emission control technologies.

Future expenditures may be required to comply with the Clean Air Act and other federal, state and local requirements for our various sites, including our pipeline, processing, transportation, and storage facilities.

These air emissions requirements also affect Chevron’s Bakken operations from which we receive substantially all of our revenues. Chevron has been required in the past, and may be required in the future, to incur significant capital expenditures to comply with new legislative and regulatory requirements relating to its operations. To the extent these capital expenditures have a material effect on Chevron, they could have a material effect on our business and results of operations.

Legislative and regulatory measures to address greenhouse gas emissions (including carbon dioxide, methane and other gases) are in various phases of discussion, rescission or implementation, and some regulatory bodies have proposed or passed climate-related laws, rules and/or regulations. These include certain state actions to develop and implement statewide or regional carbon reduction or climate-related disclosure programs, each of which require or could require reductions in our greenhouse gas emissions or those of Chevron or disclosure of climate-related matters. Additionally, our customers or other business partners may require additional climate-related information from us if they are also subject to these or additional climate-related disclosure laws or regulations. Requiring reductions in greenhouse gas emissions could result in increased costs to (i) operate and maintain our facilities, (ii) install new emission controls at our facilities and (iii) administer and manage any greenhouse gas emissions programs, including acquiring emission credits or allotments. Additionally, climate-related disclosure requirements may result in increased compliance costs, and possible litigation and reputational risks if such disclosures are incomplete, inaccurate, misleading or do not otherwise meet the expectations of our stakeholders. Moreover, such requirements may not always be uniform across jurisdictions, which may result in increased uncertainty, complexity and cost for compliance. These requirements may also significantly affect Chevron’s Bakken operations and may have an indirect effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. See “Risk Factors—Regulatory, Legal and Environmental Risks—Legislation, regulation, and other government actions and shifting customer and consumer preferences and other private efforts related to greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions and climate change could continue to increase our operational costs and reduce demand for our services, resulting in a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.”

Further, the Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) has in the past finalized, and may in the future propose, regulations under the Clean Air Act addressing greenhouse gases, to which some of our facilities may become subject. In recent years, such rules and regulations, including compliance deadlines, have been proposed, amended, rescinded, challenged, and finalized, including with respect to rules and regulations governing greenhouse gas emissions or methane emissions from oil and natural gas production and natural gas processing and transmission facilities. Congress periodically considers legislation on greenhouse gas emissions, although the ultimate adoption and form of any federal legislation cannot presently be predicted. The current U.S. presidential administration has expressed an intention to scale back various other climate regulations launched under previous administrations. Most recently, on February 18, 2026, the EPA published a final rule repealing the 2009 greenhouse gas endangerment finding and the regulation of tailpipe greenhouse gas emissions from new motor vehicles and motor vehicle engines. The final rule is expected to be subject to litigation, and the impact of such repeal is difficult to predict at this time.

In addition to domestic regulation of greenhouse gases, there continues to be international interest in a global framework for greenhouse gas reductions. However, on January 20, 2025, President Trump issued an executive order that initiated the process to withdraw the United States from the Paris Agreement, which became effective in January 2026, mandated the end of the United States’ financial commitments under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, and revoked the U.S. International Climate Finance Plan. Nevertheless, several states and geographic regions in the United States have adopted legislation and regulations to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases, including cap and trade regimes and commitments to contribute to meeting the goals of the Paris Agreement. The withdrawal of the United States from the Paris Agreement may animate stronger actions by various other policymakers at the local, state, or regional levels.

While significant uncertainty exists as to regulation of methane or other greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act or other local, regional, or international regulatory regimes, the impact of future regulatory and legislative developments, if adopted or enacted, is likely to result in increased compliance costs, increased utility costs, additional operating restrictions on our business and an increase in the cost of products generally. Although such costs may impact our business directly or indirectly by impacting Chevron’s facilities or operations, the extent and magnitude of that impact cannot be reliably or accurately estimated due to the present uncertainty regarding the additional measures and how they will be implemented.

Waste Management and Related Liabilities

Many of the environmental laws and regulations affecting our operations relate to the release of hazardous substances or solid wastes into soils, groundwater and surface water, and include measures to control pollution of the environment. These laws generally regulate the generation, storage, treatment, transportation and disposal of solid and hazardous waste. They also require corrective action, including investigation and remediation, at a facility where such waste may have been released or disposed.

CERCLA. The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), which is also known as Superfund, and comparable state laws impose liability, without regard to fault or to the legality of the original conduct, on certain classes of persons that contributed to the release of a “hazardous substance” into the environment. These persons include former and present owners or operators of the site where the release occurred and the transporters and generators of the hazardous substances found at the site. Under CERCLA, these persons may be subject to joint and several liability for the costs of cleaning up the hazardous substances that have been released into the environment, for damages to natural resources, and for the costs of certain health studies. CERCLA also authorizes the EPA and, in some instances, third parties to act in response to threats to the public health or the environment and to seek to recover from the responsible persons the costs they incur. It is not uncommon for neighboring landowners and other third parties to file claims for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by hazardous substances or other pollutants released into the environment. In the course of our ordinary operations, we may generate waste and use substances that fall within CERCLA’s definition of a “hazardous substance” and, as a result, may be jointly and severally liable under CERCLA for all or part of the costs required to clean up sites contaminated by those substances. Additionally, emerging contaminants, like per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (“PFAS”) such as perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (“PFOS”) and perfluorooctanoic acid (“PFOA”) compounds, have become subject to CERCLA regulation in addition to existing federal and state chemicals regulation, and PFAS has recently been regulated under the Toxic Substances Control Act (“TSCA”). Other emerging contaminants could also become subject to regulation under CERCLA, TSCA or comparable state laws. We cannot provide any assurance that the costs and liabilities associated with the future imposition of such remedial or regulatory compliance obligations upon us would not have a material adverse effect on our operations or financial position.

RCRA. We also generate solid wastes, including hazardous wastes, that are subject to the requirements of the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”), and comparable state statutes. From time to time, the EPA considers the adoption of stricter disposal standards for non‑hazardous wastes. Hazardous wastes are subject to more rigorous and costly disposal requirements than are non‑hazardous wastes. Any changes in the regulations for treatment, storage or disposal of RCRA‑regulated waste could increase our capital expenditures and operating expenses. We continue to seek methods to minimize the generation of hazardous wastes in our operations.

Hydrocarbon wastes. We and Chevron currently own and lease, and have in the past owned and leased, properties where hydrocarbons have been handled for many years. Although we have aimed to utilize operating and disposal practices that we believe were standard in the industry at the time, hydrocarbons or other waste may have been disposed of or released on or under the properties owned or leased by us or on or under other locations where these wastes have been taken for disposal. In addition, many of these properties have been operated by third parties whose treatment and disposal or release of hydrocarbons or other wastes was not under our control. These properties and wastes disposed thereon may be subject to CERCLA, RCRA and comparable state laws. Assuming liability is established under these laws, we could be required to remove or remediate previously disposed wastes (including wastes disposed of or released by prior owners or operators), to clean up contaminated property (including contaminated groundwater) or to perform additional remedial activities to prevent further contamination.

Water

Our operations have the potential to result in the discharge of pollutants, including crude oil. Regulations under the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (“OPA‑90”), and state laws impose regulatory burdens on our operations. Spill prevention control and countermeasure requirements of federal laws and some state laws require containment to mitigate or prevent contamination of jurisdictional waters in the event of an oil overflow, rupture or leak. For example, the CWA requires us to maintain Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (“SPCC”), plans at many of our facilities. We maintain discharge permits for facilities required under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System program of the CWA and have implemented processes to oversee our compliance efforts.

In addition, the transportation and storage of crude oil or other hazardous substances over and adjacent to water involves risk and subjects us to the provisions of OPA‑90 and related state requirements. Among other requirements, OPA‑90 and the National Contingency Plan requires the owner or operator of a tank vessel or a facility to maintain an emergency plan to respond to releases of oil or other hazardous substances. Also, in case of any such release, OPA‑90 requires the responsible company to pay resulting removal costs and damages. OPA‑90 also provides for civil penalties and imposes criminal sanctions for violations of its provisions. We operate facilities at which releases of oil or other hazardous substances could occur. We have implemented emergency oil response plans for our components and facilities covered by OPA‑90, and we have established SPCC plans for facilities subject to CWA SPCC requirements.

Construction or maintenance of our pipelines, terminals and storage facilities may impact wetlands, which are also regulated under the CWA by the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Regulatory requirements governing wetlands (including associated mitigation projects) may result in the delay of our pipeline projects while we obtain necessary permits and may increase the costs of new projects and maintenance activities. The definition of “waters of the United States” and, relatedly, the scope of CWA jurisdiction, are, and have been for many years, subject to notable rulemaking efforts and judicial challenges.

Employee and Community Safety

We are subject to the requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”), and comparable state statutes that regulate the protection of the health and safety of workers, as applied to seconded employees from Chevron. In addition, the OSHA hazard communication standard, the EPA community right-to-know regulations under Title III of CERCLA and similar state statutes and regulations require that information be maintained about hazardous materials used or produced in operations and that this information be provided as applicable to employees, state and local government authorities and citizens.

Other Regulation

Rail Regulation

We work to ensure all of our rail cars in crude oil service meet the current United States Department of Transportation (the “DOT”) DOT‑117 safety standard applicable to “high hazard flammable trains”. The adoption of additional federal, state or local laws or regulations, including any voluntary measures by the rail industry regarding rail car design or crude oil and liquid hydrocarbon rail transport activities, or efforts by local communities to restrict or limit rail traffic involving crude oil, could affect our business by increasing compliance costs and decreasing demand for our services, which could adversely affect our financial position and cash flows. Moreover, any disruptions in the operations of railroads, including those due to shortages of rail cars, locomotives or labor, weather‑related problems, flooding, drought, derailments, mechanical difficulties, strikes, lockouts or bottlenecks, or other force majeure events could adversely impact our customers’ ability to move their product and, as a result, could affect our business.

Pipeline Regulation

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) has comprehensive regulatory authority over companies that transport natural gas in interstate commerce as well as jurisdiction over the interstate transportation of oil, NGLs and liquid hydrocarbons. While most of our facilities and operations are not subject to FERC jurisdiction, some of them are regulated by FERC, and FERC policies potentially could affect our other assets as well.

Section 1(b) of the Natural Gas Act (“NGA”) exempts natural gas gathering facilities from regulation by FERC. Most of our natural gas facilities – those upstream of the Tioga Gas Plant and LM4 processing plant – meet the traditional tests FERC has used to establish whether a pipeline qualifies as “gathering” that is exempt from its jurisdiction under the NGA. Accordingly, we believe that none of those facilities or related operations are subject to FERC regulation under the NGA or the Natural Gas Policy Act (“NGPA”). In December 2024, FERC granted, subject to certain conditions, NGA certificates allowing us to transport natural gas in interstate commerce on the 60.5 mile North Dakota pipeline extending from the outlet of the Tioga Gas Plant (our sole facility providing such interstate transportation service) to an interstate pipeline. Because our pipeline from the Tioga Plant will be used solely to transport gas owned by an affiliate, FERC granted the pipeline waivers from many of its regulatory requirements generally applicable to interstate natural gas pipelines, including “open access” requirements and various tariff and filing requirements. In that same order, FERC also confirmed the non-jurisdictional status of the Tioga Gas Plant and our gathering system upstream of the plant.

We believe that the crude oil and NGL pipelines in our gathering system similarly are not subject to FERC jurisdiction under the Interstate Commerce Act (“ICA”) because they do not provide transportation in interstate commerce. In July 2024, FERC granted our request for temporary waiver of ICA filing and reporting requirements related to a pipeline lease on a third-party pipeline for the transportation in interstate commerce of crude oil produced by an affiliate from production wells in McKenzie County, North Dakota to the affiliate’s leased storage tank at a storage hub in Williams County, North Dakota. The waiver was based on the fact that the lessee’s affiliate will own all of the crude transported and that there was no demonstrated or likely third-party interest in shipping on the crude oil pipeline.

The FERC waivers from more extensive jurisdiction over both the natural gas pipeline from the Tioga Gas Plant and the referenced North Dakota crude oil pipeline were based on the facts and FERC policies at the time of the orders; potential future changes in those facts or policies could subject the pipelines to additional FERC regulation. In addition, the classification and regulation of our facilities may be subject to change based on factual developments or future determinations or policy changes by FERC, the courts, or Congress. If it is subsequently determined that an individual facility is not exempt from FERC regulation under the NGA, NGPA, or ICA, or subject to additional regulation under those statutes with the elimination of the existing waivers, such a determination could decrease revenue, increase operating costs, and, depending upon the facility in question, adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows. In addition, if we or any of our facilities were found to have violated the NGA or the NGPA, FERC has civil penalty authority to impose penalties for such violations of up to $1,584,648 per violation per day for 2025 (with annual inflation adjustments going forward), as well as disgorgement of profits associated with any violation.

In addition to FERC-regulation of interstate transportation, state regulation of gathering facilities and intrastate transportation pipelines generally includes various safety, environmental and, in some circumstances, nondiscriminatory take and common purchaser requirements, as well as complaint‑based rate regulation. Other state regulations may not directly apply to our business, but may nonetheless affect the availability of natural gas, crude oil and NGLs for purchase, compression and sale.

Safety and Maintenance

Our terminal operations, including associated pipelines, are subject to strict safety laws and regulations, including regulations under OSHA and comparable state and local regulations. We believe our terminal facilities are operated in a manner consistent with industry safe practices and standards and have fire protection in compliance with local, state and federal regulations. The tanks designed for crude oil storage at our terminals are equipped with appropriate controls that minimize emissions and promote safety. Our terminal facilities have response plans, spill prevention and control plans and other programs to respond to emergencies. Generally, rail operations are subject to federal regulations and the Association of American Railroad rules.

The transportation and storage of crude oil and other hydrocarbon products involve a risk that hazardous liquids may be released into the environment, potentially causing harm to the public or the environment. The DOT, through the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (“PHMSA”) and state agencies, enforces safety regulations with respect to the design, construction, operation, maintenance, inspection and management of our pipeline and storage facilities. PHMSA requires pipeline operators to implement integrity management programs, including more frequent inspections and other measures to ensure pipeline safety in high‑consequence areas (“HCAs”), defined as those areas that are unusually sensitive to environmental damage, that cross a navigable waterway, or that have a high population density. The regulations require operators, including us, to (i) perform ongoing assessments of pipeline integrity, (ii) identify and characterize applicable threats to pipeline segments that could impact a HCA, (iii) improve data collection, integration and analysis, (iv) repair and remediate pipelines as necessary and (v) implement preventive and mitigating actions. These regulations contain requirements for the development and implementation of pipeline integrity management programs, which include the inspection and testing of pipelines and the correction of anomalies. PHMSA’s regulations also require that pipeline operation and maintenance personnel meet certain qualifications and that pipeline operators develop comprehensive spill response plans, including extensive spill response training for pipeline personnel.

States are largely preempted by federal law from regulating pipeline safety for interstate lines, but most states are certified by the DOT to assume responsibility for enforcing federal intrastate pipeline regulations and inspection of intrastate pipelines. States may adopt stricter standards for intrastate pipelines than those imposed by the federal government for interstate lines; however, states vary considerably in their authority and capacity to address pipeline safety. State standards may include requirements for facility design and management in addition to requirements for pipelines. We do not expect these developments to have a material effect on our operations or revenues.

We inspect our pipelines to determine their condition and use the inspection information to evaluate appropriate preventative maintenance activities to validate line integrity and safety. Our inspections include the use of internal line inspection tools that provide information on the physical condition of our pipelines.

State regulations and our commercial agreements with Chevron contain product quality specification limits. However, if new or more stringent federal, state or local legal restrictions relating to the quality specification of crude oil or to crude oil transportation are adopted in areas where Chevron and our other customers operate, Chevron and our other customers could incur potentially significant added costs to comply with such requirements and experience delays or curtailment in the pursuit of production or development activities, which could reduce demand for our midstream services.

In October 2019, PHMSA started the rulemaking process for the three-part Mega Rule, which focused on: the safety of gas transmission pipelines (the first part of the Mega Rule), the safety of hazardous liquid pipelines, and enhanced emergency order procedures. In November 2021, PHMSA issued the second part of the Mega Rule that expands certain federal pipeline safety requirements to all onshore gas gathering pipelines, regardless of size or location. In August 2022, PHMSA issued the third and final part of the Mega Rule expanding the Management of Change process, extending corrosion control requirements for gas transmission pipelines, adding requirements that operators ensure no conditions exist following an extreme weather event that could adversely affect the safe operation of the pipeline, and adopting repair criteria for non-HCAs similar to those applicable to HCAs. In October 2024, PHMSA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking recommending modernizing and simplifying the hazardous material regulations, enhancing safety standards across rail, highway, and vessel transportation while also providing $100 million in annual cost savings for businesses and consumers. Following the change in Presidential Administration, PHMSA in January 2025 extended the public comment period for the rulemaking until April 28, 2025, but has not otherwise acted on that proposed rulemaking. In May 2025, PHMSA issued two Advance Notices of Proposed Rulemaking (“ANPRM”) seeking public comment on updates to its safety regulations for pipelines and LNG facilities aimed at implementing the President’s “Unleashing American Energy” Executive Order. In June 2025, PHMSA issued another ANPRM to solicit stakeholder feedback on whether to repeal or amend any requirements in its pipeline safety regulations to eliminate undue burdens on the identification, development, and use of domestic energy resources and to improve government efficiency. The ultimate impact of those efforts of the Trump Administration remains to be seen. If safety standards were to become more stringent in the future, it could cause us, like other similarly situated pipeline operators, to incur increased costs for operating our pipelines, to incur increased costs for developing future projects, or to suffer potential adverse impacts to our operations. We do not, however, expect the costs to comply with these rules to be material to our overall financial results.

Security

Since the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States, the U.S. government has issued warnings that energy infrastructure assets may be future targets of terrorist organizations. These developments have subjected our operations to increased risks. Increased security measures taken by us as a precaution against possible terrorist attacks may have resulted in increased costs to our business. Where required by federal, state or local laws, we believe we have prepared effective security plans for the storage and distribution facilities we operate. Terrorist attacks aimed at our facilities and any global and domestic economic repercussions from terrorist activities could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash available for distribution to our shareholders.

Governmental standards for the protection of computer-based systems and technology from cyber threats and attacks, have either been adopted or are being considered in the U.S. Congress and by U.S. Executive Branch departments and agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security. We currently may be subject to existing standards or standards implemented in the future. We and Chevron have implemented a cybersecurity risk management program (see Item 1C. Cybersecurity). While we continually seek to improve our cybersecurity risk management program, we cannot guarantee it will be fully implemented, complied with or effective. A significant cyber‑attack could have a material adverse effect on our operations and those of our customers.

Title to Properties and Permits

Certain of the pipelines connecting our facilities are constructed on rights‑of‑way granted by the apparent record owners of the property and in some instances these rights‑of‑way are revocable at the election of the grantor. In several instances, lands over which rights‑of‑way have been obtained could be subject to prior liens that have not been subordinated to the right‑of‑way grants. We have obtained permits from public authorities to cross over or under, or to lay pipelines in or along, watercourses, county roads, municipal streets and state highways and, in some instances, these permits are revocable at the election of the grantor. These permits may also be subject to renewal from time to time and we will generally seek renewal or arrange alternative means of transport through additional investment or commercial agreements. We have also obtained permits from railroad companies to cross over or under lands or rights-of-way, many of which are also revocable at the grantor’s election.

We work to maintain satisfactory permits and/or title to all our rights-of-way and satisfactory title to all of our assets.

Other Items

Competition

As a result of our contractual relationship with Chevron under our commercial agreements and our direct connections to Chevron’s production operations in the Williston Basin, we believe that we will not face significant competition from other midstream service providers for Chevron’s crude oil, natural gas or NGL gathering, processing or terminaling services or for other midstream services relating to Chevron’s production operations in the Bakken.

If Chevron’s production volumes decrease or if Chevron’s customers reduce their purchases of crude oil, natural gas or NGLs from Chevron due to the increased availability of less expensive products from other suppliers or for other reasons, Chevron may meet only the minimum volume commitments of our commercial agreements (or pay the shortfall fee if it does not meet the minimum volume), which could cause a material decrease in our revenues.

Seasonality

The crude oil, natural gas and NGLs that we handle, process and store are directly affected by the level of supply and demand for crude oil, natural gas and NGLs in the markets served directly or indirectly by our assets. For example, we generally fill the storage cavern at our Mentor Storage Terminal with propane during the warmer months when demand for propane is low, and gradually withdraw propane from the cavern during the colder months when demand is higher. However, we believe that many effects of seasonality on our revenues are substantially mitigated through the use of our fee-based commercial agreements with Chevron that include minimum volume commitments.

Insurance

Our assets may experience physical damage as a result of an accident or natural disaster. These hazards have the potential to cause personal injury and loss of life, severe damage to and destruction of property and equipment, pollution or environmental damage, and suspension of operations. We carry insurance policies for business interruption, certain property damage and third-party liabilities, which include sudden and accidental pollution liabilities, at varying levels of deductibles and limits that we believe are reasonable and prudent under the circumstances to cover our operations and assets. As we continue to grow, we will continue to evaluate our policy limits and deductibles as they relate to the overall cost and scope of our insurance program.

Human Capital Resources

We are managed by the board of directors and executive officers of Hess Midstream GP LLC, the general partner of our general partner. Neither we nor our subsidiaries have any employees. Hess Midstream GP LLC, as the general partner of our general partner, has the sole responsibility for providing the personnel necessary to conduct our operations and has entered into an employee secondment agreement with Chevron and certain of its subsidiaries pursuant to which Chevron and its subsidiaries make available the services of their employees in exchange for a fee. As a result, all of the employees that conduct our business are employed by affiliates of our general partner, including Chevron. As of December 31, 2025, Hess Midstream GP LLC and its affiliates had approximately 195 full‑time employee equivalents supporting our operations, including employees in the field performing services and support staff from other offices.

Office

The principal office of our Company is located at 1400 Smith Street, Houston, Texas 77002.

Website Access to Our Reports

We make available free of charge through our website, at www.hessmidstream.com, our annual reports on Form 10‑K, quarterly reports on Form 10‑Q, current reports on Form 8‑K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. The reports are also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this report. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines, and the Audit Committee Charter are available on our website and are also available in print free of charge upon request to Investor Relations at our principal executive office.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Our business activities and the value of our securities are subject to a variety of risks. The following disclosures reflect our beliefs and opinions as to factors that could materially and adversely affect us in the future. References to past events are provided by way of example only and are not intended to be a complete listing or a representation as to whether or not such factors have occurred in the past or their likelihood of occurring in the future.

Risk Factors Summary

Risks Related to Our Relationship with Chevron

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry

Regulatory, Legal and Environmental Risks

Risks Inherent in an Investment in Us

Risks Related to Our Relationship with Chevron

Chevron currently accounts for substantially all of our revenues. If Chevron changes its strategy or portfolio, or is unable for any reason, including financial or other limitations, to satisfy its obligations under our commercial agreements, our revenues would decline and our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and ability to make distributions to our shareholders could be materially and adversely affected.

On July 18, 2025, Hess and Chevron completed the previously announced merger contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 22, 2023 (the “Merger”). Following the closing of the Merger through December 31, 2025, substantially all of our revenues were attributable to our fee‑based commercial agreements with Chevron, including revenues from third‑party volumes delivered under these agreements. We expect that we will continue to derive substantially all of our revenues in the near term under multiple commercial agreements with Chevron. If Chevron changes its strategy or portfolio, or if business and operational risks or other factors result in changes to Chevron’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows, the trading price of our Class A Shares may be adversely affected and we may not be able to sustain or increase cash distributions to our shareholders over the longer term. Accordingly, we are indirectly subject to the risks of Chevron’s business and operations in the Bakken, the most significant of which include, but are not limited to, the following:

Chevron may suspend, reduce or terminate its obligations under our commercial agreements in certain circumstances, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and ability to make distributions to our shareholders.

Our commercial agreements with Chevron include provisions that permit Chevron to suspend or terminate its obligations under the applicable agreement if certain events occur. These events include our failure to perform or comply with a material warranty, covenant or obligation under the applicable commercial agreement following the expiration of a specified cure period. In particular, Chevron may suspend or reduce its obligations under our commercial agreements if a force majeure event prevents us from performing required services under the applicable agreement. Any such reduction or suspension or termination of Chevron’s obligations would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and ability to make distributions to our shareholders.

Because of the natural decline in production from existing wells in our areas of operation, our success depends, in part, on Chevron and other producers replacing declining production and also on our ability to secure new sources of natural gas and crude oil. Any decrease in the volumes of natural gas or crude oil that we handle could adversely affect our business and operating results.

The natural gas and crude oil volumes that support our business depend on the level of production from natural gas and crude oil wells connected to our facilities, which may be less than expected and will naturally decline over time. As a result, our cash flows associated with these wells will also decline over time. In order to maintain or increase throughput levels at our facilities, Chevron and other producers for which we currently or in the future may handle volumes at our facilities must replace declining production, or we must obtain new sources of natural gas and crude oil. The primary factors affecting our ability to obtain non‑dedicated sources of natural gas and crude oil include (i) the level of successful drilling activity in our areas of operation, (ii) our ability to compete for volumes from successful new wells and (iii) our ability to compete successfully for volumes from sources connected to other pipelines.

We have no control over the level of drilling activity in our areas of operation, the amount of reserves associated with wells connected to our systems or the rate at which production from a well declines. In addition, we have no control over Chevron or other producers or their drilling or production decisions, which are affected by, among other things:

Fluctuations in commodity prices can also greatly affect the development of crude oil and natural gas reserves. Drilling and production activity generally decreases as crude oil and natural gas prices decrease. Declines in crude oil and natural gas prices could have a negative impact on exploration, development and production activity, and if sustained, could lead to a material decrease in such activity and reduced utilization of our assets.

Because of these and other factors, even if crude oil and natural gas reserves are known to exist in areas served by our assets, producers may choose not to develop those reserves. If reductions in drilling activity result in our inability to maintain the current levels of throughput on our systems, those reductions could reduce our revenues and cash flow and adversely affect our ability to make cash distributions to our shareholders.

Furthermore, produced water disposal services that we provide to Chevron and any other customers assist in their drilling activities. If Chevron does not maintain its drilling activities, its demand for our produced water disposal services will be reduced regardless of whether we continue to provide other midstream services for their production, and our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

We may not be able to significantly increase our third‑party revenues due to competition and other factors, which could limit our ability to grow and extend our dependence on Chevron.

Part of our growth strategy includes diversifying our customer base by identifying opportunities to offer services to third parties with our existing assets or by constructing or acquiring new assets independently from Chevron. Our ability to increase our third‑party revenues is subject to numerous factors beyond our control, including prevailing commodity prices, competition from third parties and the extent to which we lack available capacity when third‑party customers require it. In addition, our natural gas and crude oil gathering systems and processing plants are subject to competition from existing and future third‑party natural gas and crude oil gathering systems and natural gas processing and fractionation plants in the Bakken, while our terminals and crude oil rail cars compete with third‑party terminals, pipelines and crude oil rail cars for available third‑party volumes. To the extent that we have available capacity on our gathering systems, at TGP or LM4 for third-party volumes, we may not be able to compete effectively with third‑party gathering systems or processing plants for additional natural gas production in the area. To the extent that we have available capacity at our terminals or crude oil rail cars for third‑party volumes, competition from other existing or future terminals or crude oil rail cars owned by third parties may limit our ability to utilize this available capacity.

We have historically provided midstream services to third parties on only a limited basis, and we can provide no assurance that we will be able to attract any material third‑party service opportunities. Our efforts to attract new unaffiliated customers may be adversely affected by our relationship with Chevron and our desire to provide services pursuant to fee‑based contracts. Our potential customers may prefer to obtain services under other forms of contractual arrangements under which we would be required to assume direct commodity exposure.

The Merger may cause Chevron’s financial results to differ from Chevron’s expectations or the expectations of the investment community, Chevron may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the Merger, and the Merger may disrupt Chevron’s current plans or operations, any of which may adversely affect our business results and negatively affect the trading price of our Class A Shares.

The success of the Merger, which closed in July 2025, will depend, in part, on Chevron’s ability to realize the anticipated benefits, including the anticipated run-rate cost synergies, estimated five-year production and free cash flow growth rates, and anticipated higher returns to shareholders over the long-term. Failure of Chevron to realize anticipated synergies in the expected timeframe, operational challenges for Chevron’s and our ongoing businesses, and diversion of Chevron’s and our management’s attention from ongoing business concerns and unforeseen expenses associated with the Merger may have an adverse impact on Chevron’s financial results. Because we are substantially dependent on Chevron, if the anticipated benefits of the Merger are not realized fully, or at all, or if they take longer to realize than expected, our business, financial condition and operating results could be adversely affected and could negatively affect the trading prices of our Class A Shares.

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry

Our industry is highly competitive and increased competitive pressure could adversely affect our business and operating results.

We compete with other midstream companies in our areas of operation. In addition, some of our competitors have assets in closer proximity to crude oil and natural gas supplies and have available idle capacity in existing assets that would not require new capital investments for use. Some of our competitors are large companies that have greater financial, managerial and other resources than we do. Our competitors may expand or construct gathering systems, processing plants, terminals or storage facilities that would create additional competition for the services we provide to our customers. Our ability to renew or replace existing contracts with our customers at rates sufficient to maintain current revenue and cash flow could be adversely affected by the activities of our competitors and our customers. All of these competitive pressures could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and our ability to make cash distributions to our shareholders.

Seasonal weather conditions and other natural or human causes beyond our control may affect our facilities or the facilities of third parties on which we depend and could impact our business and our results of operations and financial condition.

Our facilities and operations, as well as the facilities and operations of our suppliers, third-party service providers and customers, including Chevron, are subject to disruption from natural or human causes beyond our control, including risks from hurricanes, severe storms, floods, heat waves, and other forms of severe weather; wildfires; ambient temperature increases; sea level rise; war or other military conflicts such as the conflict between Russia and Ukraine and in the Middle East; accidents; civil unrest; political events such as current geopolitical tensions in Venezuela; fires; earthquakes; system failures; cyber threats; terrorist acts; and epidemic or pandemic diseases, some of which may be impacted by climate change and any of which could result in suspension of operations or harm to people or the natural environment.

Crude oil and natural gas operations in North Dakota are adversely affected by seasonal weather conditions. In the Bakken, we have experienced and may continue to experience adverse effects of weather conditions on drilling and other crude oil and natural gas activities during the winter months. Severe winter weather conditions limit and may reduce or temporarily halt our customers’ ability to operate during such conditions, leading to the decrease in drilling activity and the potential shutin of producing wells which the producers are unable to service. This could result in a decrease in the volumes of crude oil, natural gas and NGLs supplied to our assets. In addition, seasonal weather conditions during the winter months may adversely impact the operations of our assets and our ability to construct additional facilities, by causing temporary delays and shutdowns. Further, increased energy use due to weather changes may require us to invest in order to serve increased demand or create operational challenges. A decrease in energy use due to weather changes may affect our financial condition through decreased revenues. To the extent the frequency of severe weather conditions increases, this could, among other things, cause damage to our facilities, interrupt our services or supply chain, or increase our cost of providing service. If any of these results occur, it could have an adverse effect on our assets and operations and cause us to incur costs in preparing for and responding to them.

To the extent any of these events were to occur, the resulting impacts could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and our ability to make cash distributions to our shareholders.

Our success depends on activities in a limited geographic area.

Substantially all of our assets are located in the Bakken, and we continue to focus our future capital expenditures largely on developing our business in that area. As a result, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows are significantly dependent upon the demand for our services in that area. Due to our focus on the Bakken, an adverse development in crude oil or natural gas production from that area would have a significantly greater impact on our financial condition and results of operations than if we spread expenditures more evenly over a wider geographic area. For example, a change in the rules and regulations governing operations in or around the Bakken could cause Chevron or other producers to reduce or cease drilling or to permanently or temporarily shut‑in their production within the area, which could lead to a decrease in the volumes of natural gas and crude oil that we handle and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and our ability to make cash distributions to our shareholders.

Our operations are subject to inherent risks and operational hazards, some of which may result in business interruptions and shutdowns of our operations and damages for which we may not be fully covered by insurance. If a significant accident or event occurs that results in a business interruption or shut down for which we are not adequately insured, our operations and financial results could be materially and adversely affected.

Our operations are subject to the risks and operational hazards inherent in gathering, compressing, processing, fractionating, terminaling, storing, loading and transporting crude oil, natural gas and NGLs and gathering and disposing of produced water, including:

These risks could result in substantial losses due to personal injury and/or loss of life, severe damage to and destruction of property and equipment and pollution or other environmental damage, all of which can result in legal liability, as well as business interruptions or shutdowns of our facilities and reputational consequences. Any such event or unplanned shutdown could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, Chevron’s Bakken production operations, on which our operations are substantially dependent, are subject to similar operational hazards and risks inherent in producing crude oil and natural gas. We have no control over Chevron’s Bakken production operations and their associated facilities.

We do not maintain insurance coverage against all potential losses and could suffer losses for uninsurable or uninsured risks or in amounts in excess of existing insurance coverage. We carry insurance coverage for certain property damage, business interruptions, and third-party liabilities, which includes sudden and accidental pollution liabilities. The occurrence of an event that is not fully covered by insurance or failure by one or more insurers to honor its coverage commitments for an insured event could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our exposure to direct commodity price risk may increase in the future.

We generate substantially all of our revenues under fee‑based commercial agreements with Chevron under which we are paid based on the volumes of crude oil, natural gas and NGLs that we handle and the ancillary services we provide, rather than the value of the commodities themselves. As a result, our operations and cash flows generally have minimal direct exposure to commodity price risk. While the initial term of our commercial agreements provides for an annual fee recalculation mechanism to target a return on capital deployed, the Secondary Term of our commercial agreements changes to an inflation-based fee structure, which may provide less downside risk protection. In addition, we may acquire or develop additional assets in the future or enter into transactions that have a greater exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices than our current operations. Our efforts to negotiate contractual arrangements to minimize our direct exposure to commodity price risk in the future may not be successful. Recent growing concerns about global economic growth, political instability, tariffs and escalations of trade disputes and inflation could have a significant adverse impact on global financial markets and commodity prices, which could reduce demand for our midstream services and affect the ability of our business partners, suppliers and customers to conduct business. Additionally, commodity prices have been significantly affected by geopolitical conflicts and wars, such as the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine and the conflict between Israel and Hamas. Increased exposure to the volatility of crude oil, natural gas and NGL prices in the future could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and cash flow and our ability to make distributions to our shareholders.

We utilize contract operator services at certain of our assets, and we may face higher costs associated with terminal services in the future.

We utilize contract operator services at certain of our assets. For example, we utilize contract operator services at our Tioga Rail Terminal under a rail and transload services agreement with a third‑party operator that may be terminated by us with 90-day notice. Under the terms of the agreement, third‑party contract personnel supervised by Chevron employees control, monitor, record and report on the operation of the Tioga Rail Terminal. Contract personnel also provide inspection, crude oil loading, railroad consulting, inventory management, repair, data reporting, general maintenance and technical support and safety compliance services. Under this agreement, we are liable for any losses resulting from actions of the third‑party operator unless such losses result from the negligence of the third‑party operator. If disputes arise over the operation of the terminal, or if the third‑party operator fails to provide the services contracted under contract operator services agreements, our business, results of operation, and financial condition could be adversely affected. We previously extended the term of this agreement and expanded services to include rail car qualification and maintenance management and we expect to renew the agreement before it expires. Costs of these services under a negotiated renewal of the existing agreement or a similar agreement may increase relative to historical costs. Concerns over global economic conditions, inflation, supply chain disruptions, labor shortages and other factors, each of which are beyond our control, contribute to increased economic uncertainty for us and our service providers. Any such increased costs associated with terminal operation services will decrease the amount of cash available for distribution to our shareholders.

Restrictions in our credit facilities could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and the value of our Class A Shares.

We are dependent upon the earnings and cash flow generated by our operations in order to meet any debt service obligations and to allow us to make cash distributions to our shareholders. Our existing credit agreement for our senior unsecured credit facilities (the “Credit Facilities”) consisting of a $1.0 billion five-year revolving credit facility and a fully drawn $400.0 million five-year Term Loan A facility contains various operating and financial restrictions and covenants. The operating and financial restrictions and covenants in our credit facilities restrict, and any future financing agreements could similarly restrict, our ability to finance our future operations or capital needs or to expand or pursue our business activities, which may, in turn, limit our ability to make cash distributions to our shareholders.

The provisions of our credit facilities could affect our ability to obtain future financing and pursue attractive business opportunities and our flexibility in planning for, and reacting to, changes in business conditions. In addition, a failure to comply with the provisions of our credit facilities would result in an event of default which would enable our lenders to declare the outstanding principal of that debt, together with accrued interest, to be immediately due and payable. If the payment of our debt is accelerated, defaults under our other debt instruments, if any, may be triggered, and our assets may be insufficient to repay such debt in full, and the holders of our shares could experience a partial or total loss of their investment. Please read “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Capital Resources and Liquidity” for additional information about our credit facilities.

We have a significant amount of consolidated indebtedness that may adversely affect our business, results of operations and ability to make quarterly distributions.

We have a significant amount of consolidated indebtedness. As of December 31, 2025, we had $3,073.0 million carrying value of outstanding senior notes of the Partnership, $338.0 million carrying value of borrowings outstanding under the Partnership’s senior unsecured revolving credit facility and $361.0 million carrying value of borrowings outstanding under the Partnership’s senior unsecured Term Loan A facility.

The degree to which we are leveraged, combined with lease and other financial obligations and contractual commitments, could have important consequences to us, including the following:

Our ability to service our indebtedness will depend upon, among other things, our future financial and operating performance, which will be affected by prevailing economic conditions and financial, business, regulatory and other factors, some of which are beyond our control. If our operating results are not sufficient to service our current or future indebtedness, we will be forced to take actions such as reducing or delaying business activities, acquisitions, investments or capital expenditures, selling assets, restructuring or refinancing debt, or seeking additional equity capital, and such results may adversely affect our ability to make cash distributions.

Restrictions in the terms of our consolidated indebtedness could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and ability to make quarterly cash distributions.

The terms of certain of our consolidated indebtedness limit our ability to conduct our business, including our ability to:

Our consolidated indebtedness also contains covenants requiring us to maintain certain financial ratios. Our ability to meet those financial ratios and other covenants can be affected by events beyond our control, and there can be no assurance that we will meet any such ratios or tests.

If we are unable to make acquisitions on economically acceptable terms from third parties, our future growth could be limited, and any acquisitions we may make may reduce, rather than increase, our cash flows and ability to make distributions to shareholders.

Part of our long-term strategy to grow our business is dependent on our ability to make acquisitions. The acquisition component of our growth strategy is based, in large part, on our expectation of ongoing divestitures of midstream assets by industry participants.

If we are unable to make acquisitions from third parties, because (i) there is a material decrease in divestitures of midstream assets, (ii) we are unable to identify attractive acquisition candidates or negotiate acceptable purchase contracts, (iii) we are unable to obtain financing or to access the capital markets for future debt or equity offerings on economically acceptable terms, (iv) we are outbid by competitors or (v) for any other reason, our future growth and ability to increase our distributions will be limited. Our partnership agreement requires that we distribute all of our available cash to our shareholders. As a result, we expect to rely primarily upon external financing sources, including borrowings under our revolving credit facility and the issuance of debt and equity securities, to fund future acquisitions. Even if we are successful in obtaining funds for acquisitions through equity or debt financings, the terms thereof could limit our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders. In addition, issuing additional partner interests may result in significant shareholder dilution and increase the aggregate amount of cash required to maintain the then-current distribution rates, which could materially decrease our ability to pay distributions at the then-current distribution rates. If funding is not available to us when needed, or is available only on unfavorable terms, we may be unable to execute our business strategy, complete acquisitions or otherwise take advantage of business opportunities or respond to competitive pressures, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to make quarterly cash distributions to our shareholders.

Furthermore, even if we do consummate acquisitions that we believe will be accretive, they may in fact result in a decrease in distributions as a result of incorrect assumptions in our evaluation of such acquisitions or unforeseen consequences or other external events beyond our control. If we consummate any future acquisitions, shareholders will not have the opportunity to evaluate the economic, financial and other relevant information that we will consider in evaluating any such acquisitions.

The completion of capital projects by us may not result in revenue increases and will be subject to regulatory, environmental, political, legal and economic risks, which could adversely affect our operations and financial condition.

As part of our long-term growth strategy, we intend to increase utilization of our existing asset base and increase revenue at our facilities by handling additional volumes of natural gas and crude oil resulting from the completion of various capital projects by us. For example, we completed a construction and reconfiguration of facilities and pipelines in McKenzie and Williams Counties that increased our throughput capacity for crude oil and natural gas originating from south of the Missouri River and moving northward to our natural gas processing and crude oil and NGL terminaling assets in Tioga and Ramberg. We also invested in construction of the LM4 gas processing plant south of the Missouri River as part of our joint venture with Targa and we expanded natural gas processing capacity at TGP by 150 MMcf/d for total processing capacity of 400 MMcf/d.

There are inherent risks associated with undertaking these and other capital projects, including numerous regulatory, environmental, political and legal uncertainties, most of which are beyond our control. If we undertake these projects, they may not be completed on schedule or at all or at the budgeted cost, limiting our capacity until completion, or their completion may not result in the anticipated increase in volumes at our facilities, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition and our ability in the future to make distributions to our shareholders.

Cyberattacks and events affecting our operational technology networks or other digital infrastructure used by us, Chevron or our other business partners could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business and results of operations.

There are numerous and evolving risks to the Company’s cybersecurity and privacy from cyber threat actors, including criminal hackers, state-sponsored intrusions, industrial espionage and employee malfeasance. These cyber threat actors, whether internal or external to the Company, are becoming more sophisticated and coordinated in their attempts to access the Company’s information technology (“IT”) systems and data, including the IT systems of cloud providers and other third parties with whom the Company conducts business through, without limitation, malicious software; data breaches by employees, insiders or others with authorized access; cyber or phishing-attacks; ransomware; attempts to gain unauthorized access to our data and systems; and other electronic security breaches. The cyber risk landscape changes over time due to a variety of internal and external factors, including during organizational changes, relocating work to international geographies, or other corporate transactions; political tensions; war or other military conflicts; or civil unrest. Chevron provides substantial operational and administrative services to us in support of our assets and operations, including processes for the assessment, identification and management of material risks from cybersecurity threats. Although Chevron and the Company devote significant resources to prevent unwanted intrusions and to protect our systems and data, whether such data is housed internally or by external third parties, the Company has experienced and will continue to experience cyber incidents of varying degrees in the conduct of its business. Cyber threat actors could compromise the Company’s operational technology networks or other critical systems and infrastructure, resulting in disruptions to our business operations, injury to people, harm to the environment or our assets, disruptions in access to its financial reporting systems, or loss, misuse or corruption of its critical data and proprietary information, including without limitation its intellectual property and business information and that of our personnel, customers (including Chevron), partners and other third parties. Any of the foregoing can be exacerbated by a delay or failure to detect a cyber incident or the full extent of such incident. Further, the Company is increasingly experiencing cyber incidents related to its third-party vendors. Some third-party vendors house the Company’s critical data and proprietary information on their IT systems, including the cloud; others have access to the Company’s IT systems or provide software through which threat actors could gain access or introduce malware to the Company’s IT systems. Our use of third-party software, services and support may also result in unintentional, non-malicious events or outages that affect our ability to operate critical business systems.

Regardless of the precise method or form, events affecting our networks or digital infrastructure could result in significant financial losses, legal or regulatory violations, reputational harm, and legal liability and could ultimately have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and results of operations. To the extent that Chevron experiences cyberattacks and/or events affecting its operational technology networks or other digital infrastructure, the Company could experience significant financial losses, legal or regulatory violations, reputational harm, and legal liability that could ultimately have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and results of operations.

The Company is incorporating artificial intelligence technologies into its processes and these technologies may present business, compliance, and reputational risks.

The Company is increasingly utilizing artificial intelligence (“AI”) technologies in certain of our processes, information systems and various operations, and the Company expects that AI will assume a more critical role in operations over time. The use of AI technologies introduces certain risks to the Company, including potential dependency on biased or incorrect AI outputs, new or enhanced regulatory requirements, litigation, privacy risks, cybersecurity risks, reputational harm, liability or other adverse consequences, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, other unforeseen risks stemming from the Company’s, Chevron’s or third-party service providers’ use and development of AI tools and technologies, or the Company’s inability to adopt such technologies at the same pace as its competitors, may arise in the future that could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Regulatory, Legal and Environmental Risks

Our assets and operations are subject to federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating to environmental protection and health and safety that could require us to make substantial expenditures.

Certain of our assets and operations are subject to federal, state, and local laws and regulations, which impose numerous obligations on our and our customers’ operations, including: the acquisition of permits to conduct regulated activities; the incurrence of capital or operating expenditures to limit or prevent releases of materials from our or our customers’ operations; the imposition of specific standards addressing worker protection, and the imposition of substantial liabilities and remedial obligations for pollution or contamination resulting from our and our customers’ operations. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may result in joint and several or strict liability and the assessment by governmental authorities of administrative, civil and criminal penalties, the imposition of remedial obligations, and the issuance of injunctions limiting or preventing some or all of our operations. In addition, we may experience a delay in obtaining or be unable to obtain required permits, which may cause us to lose potential and current customers, interrupt operations, and limit growth and revenues. Private parties may also have the right to pursue legal actions to enforce compliance, as well as to seek damages for non-compliance, with environmental and safety laws and regulations or for personal injury or property damage.

The handling of crude oil, natural gas and NGLs involves inherent risks of spills and releases. The various spill response service companies we have contracted with in the areas in which we gather, load, transport or store crude oil and NGLs may not be able to adequately contain a discharge in all instances, and we cannot ensure that all of their services would be available at any given time. Should these parties not be able to adequately contain such a discharge, we may face substantial liabilities and remedial obligations depending on the size and scope of any such discharge.

We may incur significant costs and liabilities as a result of pipeline integrity management program testing and any related pipeline repair or preventative or remedial measures.

DOT, through PHMSA, has adopted regulations requiring pipeline operators to develop integrity management systems. PHMSA regularly proposes revisions to existing regulations as well as new pipeline safety regulations. For example, in October 2019, PHMSA started the rulemaking process for the first part of the three‑part Mega Rule, which focused on: the safety of gas transmission pipelines, the safety of hazardous liquid pipelines, and enhanced emergency order procedures. In November 2021, PHMSA issued the second part of the Mega Rule that expands certain federal pipeline safety requirements to all onshore gas gathering pipelines, regardless of size or location. In August 2022, PHMSA issued the third and final part of the Mega Rule expanding the Management of Change process, extending corrosion control requirements for gas transmission pipelines, adding requirements that operators ensure no conditions exist following an extreme weather event that could adversely affect the safe operation of the pipeline, and adopting repair criteria for non-HCAs similar to those applicable to HCAs. In October 2024, PHMSA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking recommending modernizing and simplifying the hazardous material regulations, enhancing safety standards across rail, highway, and vessel transportation while also providing $100 million in annual cost savings for businesses and consumers. Following the change in Presidential Administration, PHMSA in January 2025 extended the public comment period for the rulemaking until April 28, 2025, but has not otherwise acted on that proposed rulemaking. In May 2025, PHMSA issued two ANPRMs seeking public comment on updates to its safety regulations for pipelines and LNG facilities aimed at implementing the President’s “Unleashing American Energy” Executive Order. In June 2025, PHMSA issued another ANPRM to solicit stakeholder feedback on whether to repeal or amend any requirements in its pipeline safety regulations to eliminate undue burdens on the identification, development, and use of domestic energy resources and to improve government efficiency. The ultimate impact of those efforts of the Trump Administration remains to be seen. If safety standards were to become more stringent in the future, it could cause us, like other similarly situated pipeline operators, to incur increased costs for operating our pipelines, to incur increased costs for developing future projects, or to suffer potential adverse impacts to our operations. We do not, however, expect the costs to comply to be material to our overall financial results.

In addition, the Protecting Our Infrastructure of Pipelines and Enhancing Safety Act of 2020 (the “PIPES Act”) was signed into law on December 27, 2020. Among other things, the act requires PHMSA to issue regulations addressing idled pipelines, the safety of gas gathering pipelines, minimum performance standards for methane leak detection and repair and gas distribution pipelines’ emergency response plans, responses to over pressurization events, and maintenance of maps and records of critical pressure control infrastructure. In addition, the act includes the adoption of due process improvements related to PHMSA enforcement, requires routine reporting to Congress regarding outstanding pipeline rulemaking, and an independent study regarding the cost-benefit of automated shut-off valves. The Trump Administration has taken various actions related to implementation of the PIPES Act, including withdrawing guidance related to inspection and maintenance plans, requesting comments on proposed changes to the implementation of repair criteria and pipeline safety regulations, and proposing several rules to update pipeline safety standards throughout 2025.

While some of these changes may provide more flexibility to us, the introduction of these and other laws or regulations requires us to monitor the dynamic regulatory landscape, and their adoption and implementation could require us to change our existing protocols, install new or modified safety controls, pursue new capital projects, or conduct maintenance programs on a revised or accelerated basis, all of which could require us to incur increased operational costs that could be significant. While we cannot predict the outcome of legislative or regulatory initiatives, such legislative and regulatory changes could have a material effect on our cash flow.

In addition, if we fail to comply with applicable PHMSA regulations, rules, or orders, this could result in the imposition of civil penalties. Pursuant to the Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty and Job Creation Act of 2011, or 2011 Pipeline Safety Act, PHMSA finalized rules that increased the maximum administrative civil penalties for violations of the pipeline safety laws and regulations. For 2025, the maximum penalty for each pipeline safety violation was $272,926 per violation, with a maximum of $2,729,245 for a series of related violations, with the amounts adjusted annually to account for inflation.

If our assets become subject to additional FERC regulation, or if federal, state or local regulations or policies change, or if we fail to comply with such regulations, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected.

FERC has comprehensive regulatory authority over companies that transport natural gas in interstate commerce as well as jurisdiction over the interstate transportation of oil, NGLs and liquid hydrocarbons. While most of our facilities and operations are not subject to FERC jurisdiction, some of them are regulated by FERC, and FERC policies potentially could affect other assets as well.

Most of our natural gas facilities – those upstream of the Tioga Gas Plant and the LM4 processing plant – meet the traditional tests FERC has used to establish whether a pipeline qualifies as “gathering” that is exempt from its jurisdiction under the NGA. Accordingly, we believe that none of those facilities or related operations are subject to FERC regulation under the NGA or the NGPA. We have obtained from FERC NGA certificate authority allowing us to transport natural gas in interstate commerce on the 60.5 mile North Dakota pipeline extending from the outlet of the Tioga Gas Plant to an interstate pipeline (our sole facility providing such interstate transportation service), along with waivers from many of its regulatory requirements generally applicable to interstate pipelines.

Similarly, we believe that the crude oil and NGL pipelines in our gathering system are not subject to FERC jurisdiction under the ICA because they do not provide transportation in interstate commerce. We have obtained from FERC temporary waiver of ICA filing and

reporting requirements for the transportation in interstate commerce of crude oil produced by an affiliate from North Dakota production wells to the affiliate’s leased storage tank at a storage hub.

The FERC waivers from more extensive regulation of both the natural gas pipeline from the Tioga Gas Plant and the referenced North Dakota crude oil pipeline were based on the facts and FERC policies at the time of the orders; potential future changes in those facts or policies could subject the pipelines to additional FERC regulation. In addition, the classification and regulation of our facilities may be subject to change based on factual developments or future determinations or policy changes by FERC, the courts, or Congress. If it is subsequently determined that an individual facility is not exempt from FERC regulation under the NGA, NGPA, or ICA, or subject to additional regulation under those statutes with the elimination of the existing waivers, such determination could decrease revenue, increase operating costs, and depending upon the facility in question, adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows. In addition, if we or any of our facilities were found to have violated the NGA or the NGPA, FERC has civil penalty authority to impose penalties for such violations of up to $1,584,648 per violation per day for 2025 (with annual inflation adjustments going forward), as well as disgorgement of profits associated with any violation.

In addition to the FERC-regulation of interstate transportation, state regulation of gathering facilities and intrastate transportation pipelines generally include various safety, environmental, and in some circumstances, nondiscriminatory take and common purchaser requirements, as well as complaint-based rate regulation. Further changes in such state regulation could also affect our costs, revenues, or operations.

Evolving laws and regulations on crude oil, including stabilization and transportation, could have an effect on our financial performance.

In December 2014, the North Dakota Industrial Commission (“NDIC”) issued Order No. 25417, which requires producers in the Bakken, among other fields, effective April 1, 2015, to heat their produced fluids to a specified minimum temperature or demonstrate that crude oil has a vapor pressure no greater than 13.7 psi prior to separation. In January 2019, the NDIC issued revisions to the order giving operators more flexibility for evaluating and demonstrating compliance with the state’s vapor pressure requirements.

Furthermore, rail car derailments in Canada and the United States have led to increased regulatory scrutiny over the safety of transporting Bakken crude oil by rail. For example, the Federal Railroad Administration (“FRA”) of the DOT and PHMSA issued several Safety Advisories and Emergency Orders directing offerors and rail carriers to take additional precautionary measures to enhance the safe shipment of bulk quantities of crude oil. Currently, all of the rail cars in our fleet are DOT 117 rail cars that meet the requirements of the final DOT rule. In addition, the adoption of additional federal, state or local laws or regulations, including any new voluntary measures by the rail industry regarding rail car design or crude oil and liquid hydrocarbon rail transport activities, or efforts by local communities to restrict or limit rail traffic involving crude oil, could increase compliance costs and decrease demand for our services, which could adversely affect our financial position and cash flows.

If new or more stringent federal, state or local legal restrictions relating to the quality specification of crude oil or to crude oil transportation are adopted in areas where Chevron and our other customers operate, Chevron and our other customers could incur potentially significant added costs to comply with such requirements and experience delays or curtailment in the pursuit of production or development activities, which could reduce demand for our midstream services.

Evolving environmental laws and regulations on hydraulic fracturing could have an effect on our financial performance.

We do not conduct hydraulic fracturing operations, but Chevron’s and our other customers’ crude oil and natural gas production operations often require hydraulic fracturing as part of the completion process. While hydraulic fracturing is typically regulated by state agencies, federal agencies have also asserted regulatory authority over the process. In addition, Congress may in the future further consider legislation giving the EPA direct authority to regulate and require federal permitting of hydraulic fracturing under the Safe Drinking Water Act.

Many states have already adopted laws and/or regulations that require disclosure of the chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing and are considering legal requirements that could impose more stringent permitting, disclosure and well construction requirements on crude oil and/or natural gas drilling activities.

If new or more stringent federal, state or local legal and regulatory restrictions relating to the hydraulic fracturing process are adopted in areas where Chevron and our other customers operate, Chevron and our other customers could incur potentially significant added costs to comply with such requirements and experience delays or curtailment in the pursuit of production or development activities, which could reduce demand for our midstream services.

Legislation, regulation, and other government actions and shifting customer and consumer preferences and other private efforts related to greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions and climate change could continue to increase our operational costs and reduce demand for our services, resulting in a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

The Company and our customers, including Chevron, have experienced and may be further challenged by increases in the impacts of international and domestic legislation, regulation, or other government actions relating to GHG emissions (e.g., carbon dioxide and methane) and climate change. International agreements and national, regional, and state legislation and regulatory measures that aim to directly or indirectly limit or reduce GHG emissions are in various stages of implementation.

Legislation, regulation, and other government actions related to GHG emissions and climate change could reduce demand for our services and/or continue to increase our operational costs and reduce customers’ return on investment, including Chevron. Globally, multiple jurisdictions are considering adopting or are in the process of implementing laws or regulations to directly regulate GHG emissions through a carbon tax, a cap-and-trade program, performance standards or other mechanisms, or to attempt to indirectly advance reduction of GHG emissions through restrictive permitting, procurement standards, trade barriers, minimum renewable usage requirements, financing standards, standards or requirements for environmental benefit claims, increased GHG reporting and climate-related disclosure requirements, or tax advantages or other incentives to promote the use of alternative energy, fuel sources or lower-carbon technologies. Many of these actions, as well as consumers’ preferences and use of our customers’ products or substitute products, and actions taken by customers’ competitors in response to legislation and regulations, are beyond the Company’s control.

Similar to any significant changes in the regulatory environment, climate change-related legislation, regulation, or other government actions may curtail profitability, as well as render the extraction of hydrocarbon resources by our customers, including Chevron, economically infeasible. In particular, GHG emissions-related legislation, regulations, and other government actions, and shifting customer and consumer preferences and other private efforts aimed at reducing GHG emissions may result in increased and substantial capital, compliance, operating, and maintenance costs and could, among other things, reduce demand for hydrocarbons and hydrocarbon-based products; increase demand for lower carbon products and alternative energy sources; make such products more expensive; adversely affect the economic feasibility of our customers’ resources; and impact or limit the Company’s and our customers’ business plans, which could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

The ultimate effect of international agreements; national, regional, and state legislation and regulation; and government and private actions related to GHG emissions and climate change on the Company’s financial performance, and the timing of these effects, will depend on a number of factors. Such factors include, among others, the sectors covered, the GHG emissions reductions required, the use of standardized carbon accounting, the extent to which our customers, including Chevron, would be able to receive, generate, purchase, or retire credits, and the extent to which our customers are able to recover, or continue to recover, the costs incurred through the pricing of their products in the competitive marketplace. Further, the ultimate impact of GHG emissions and climate change-related agreements, legislation, regulation, and government actions on the Company’s financial performance is highly uncertain because the Company is unable to predict with certainty, for a multitude of individual jurisdictions, the outcome of political decision-making processes and legal challenges, including the actual laws and regulations enacted, the variables and trade-offs that inevitably occur in connection with such processes, and market conditions, including the responses of our customers to such changes.

Attention to environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) matters impacts us.

Attention to ESG matters, including those related to climate change and sustainability; evolving societal, investor and governmental pressure on companies to address ESG matters; and potential consumer use of substitutes to hydrocarbon-based products have impacted our customers’ portfolios and activities, increased costs, and reduced demand for products sold by our customers, including Chevron, which may result in reduced demand for our services, negative impacts on share price and access to capital markets, and damage to the Company’s reputation.

Some stakeholders, including but not limited to sovereign wealth, pension, and endowment funds, have been divesting and promoting divestment of, or screening out, fossil fuel equities and urging lenders to limit funding to companies engaged in the oil and gas sector. Further, voluntary carbon-related and target-setting frameworks have been developed that may limit the ability of certain sectors, including the oil and gas sector, from accessing capital, and may result in exclusion of the Company’s equity or debt from being included as an investment option in portfolios. In addition, some stakeholders have divergent and evolving views on ESG-related strategies and priorities. These circumstances, among others, may result in pressure from activists on our customers’ production; unfavorable reputational impacts to us and our customers, including inaccurate perceptions or a misrepresentation of actual ESG policies, practices and performance; and diversion of management’s attention and resources, among other material adverse impacts, which will affect our business.

In addition, organizations that provide information to investors on corporate governance and related matters have developed ratings processes for evaluating companies on their approach to ESG matters, including climate change and climate-related risks (including entities commonly referred to as “raters and rankers”). Such ratings are used by some investors to inform their investment decisions. Unfavorable ESG ratings and investment community divestment initiatives, among other actions, may lead to negative investor sentiment toward us or our customers, including Chevron, and the diversion of investment to other industries, which could have a negative impact on our Class A share price and our access to and costs of capital. Additionally, evolving expectations on various ESG matters, including human rights, biodiversity, waste and water, have increased, and may continue to increase costs, require changes in how we and our customers operate and lead to negative stakeholder sentiment.

Ambitions and disclosures related to ESG matters subject us to numerous risks that may negatively impact our reputation and Class A share price or result in other material adverse impacts to the Company.

Chevron takes actions to help lower the carbon intensity of its operations while continuing to meet the demand for energy. The Company plays a critical role in this objective with respect to the Bakken region, including our focus on natural gas capture through increased availability and reliability at our compressor stations, gathering and processing infrastructure, and enhanced communication and coordination with third-party gatherers.

Our ability to achieve any lower carbon-related ambition, including those related to GHG emissions or climate-related initiatives as well as efforts concerning the Bakken, is subject to numerous risks and contingencies, many of which are outside of our control and persist. Examples of such risks and contingencies include: sufficient and substantial advances in technology, including progress of commercially viable technologies and low- or non-carbon-based energy sources; laws, governmental regulation, policies, and other enabling actions, including those regarding subsidies, tax and other incentives as well as the granting of necessary permits by governing authorities; the availability of suppliers that can meet sustainability-related standards; evolving regulatory requirements affecting ESG standards or disclosures; evolving standards for tracking and reporting on emissions and emission reductions and removals; consumers’ preferences and use of oil and gas products or substitute products; and actions taken by competitors of the Company’s customers (including Chevron).

The standards and regulations for tracking, reporting, disclosing, marketing and advertising related to ESG matters are relatively new, have not been harmonized, and continue to evolve. Further, Chevron’s selection of disclosure frameworks, which seek to align with various voluntary reporting standards and are utilized by the Company, may change from time to time. Either of these circumstances may result in a lack of comparative data from period to period.

The Company utilizes Chevron’s processes and controls, which may not align with evolving voluntary and mandatory standards for identifying, measuring, and reporting ESG metrics. Chevron’s interpretation of reporting standards may differ from those of others, and such standards may change over time, including through non-public processes, any of which could result in significant revisions to lower carbon-related ambitions or reported progress in achieving such ambitions. Achievement of or efforts to achieve climate-related initiatives has, and may continue to, increase costs, and, in addition, may require the purchase of carbon credits, or limit or impact the Company’s business plans, operations and financial results, potentially resulting in reduction to the economic end-of-life of certain of our customers’ assets, impairing the associated net book value, among other material adverse impacts. If Chevron changes and/or eliminates a climate-related ambition, our activities or ambitions in the Bakken will be impacted. Our failure or perceived failure to pursue or fulfill lower carbon-related ambitions within the timelines we announce, or at all, or to satisfy various reporting standards and regulations could have a negative impact on the Company’s reputation, investor sentiment, ratings outcomes for evaluating the Company’s approach to ESG matters, Class A share price, and cost of capital and expose us to government enforcement actions and private litigation, among other material adverse impacts.

We may be unable to obtain or renew permits or approvals necessary for our operations, which could inhibit our ability to do business and adversely affect our financial performance.

Our facilities and our customers’ facilities that provide volumes to our facilities operate under federal, state and local permits, licenses and approvals with terms and conditions containing a significant number of prescriptive limits and performance standards that require a significant amount of monitoring, record keeping and reporting in order to demonstrate compliance. A decision by a government agency to deny or delay issuing a new or renewed permit or approval, or to revoke or substantially modify an existing permit or approval, could have an adverse impact on a customer’s ability to produce crude oil and natural gas or on our ability to handle volumes of crude oil, natural gas, NGLs or produced water at our facilities, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Additionally, noncompliance or incomplete documentation of our compliance status with respect to our existing permits or approvals may result in the imposition of fines, penalties and injunctive relief. Furthermore, we obtain certain rights to construct and operate on land owned by third parties and governmental agencies, but some of our agreements may grant us those rights for only a specific period of time. Loss of these rights, through our inability to renew right-of-way contracts or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions to our shareholders.

Since April 2020, the Nationwide Permit (“NWP”) 12, the general permit issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”) for construction of new oil and gas pipelines and utility projects, has been subject to federal litigation challenges. After a federal court vacated and enjoined the use of NWP 12 in 2020, the Corps released the final version of a rule in January 2021 renewing twelve of its NWPs, including NWP 12. The rule split NWP 12 into three parts: NWP 12 continues to be available for oil and gas pipelines, while NWP 57 is available for electric utility line and telecommunications activities, and NWP 58 is available for utility line activities for water and other substances. The rule also eliminated preconstruction notice requirements for NWP 12 for several conditions that used to require such notice, but also required new oil and gas pipeline projects that exceed 250 miles in length to give preconstruction notice and obtain approval before proceeding. On June 18, 2025, the Corps published a notice announcing that it is proposing to reissue and modify existing NWPs, including NWP 12. If new oil and gas pipeline projects are unable to utilize NWP 12 or identify an alternate means of CWA compliance, such projects could be significantly delayed or impacted, which could have an adverse impact on our operations or our financial condition.

In the future we may face increased obligations relating to our produced water facilities and may be required to provide an increased level of financial assurance to guarantee the appropriate closure activities occur for our produced water facilities.

Obtaining a permit to own or operate produced water facilities generally requires us to establish performance bonds, letters of credit or other forms of financial assurance to address clean-up and closure obligations. As we acquire additional produced water facilities or expand our existing produced water facilities, these obligations will increase. Additionally, in the future, regulatory agencies may require us to increase the amount of our closure bonds at existing produced water facilities. Actual costs could exceed our current expectations, as a result of, among other things, federal, state or local government regulatory action, increased costs charged by service providers that assist in closing produced water facilities and additional environmental remediation requirements. The obligation to satisfy increased regulatory requirements associated with our produced water facilities could result in an increase of our operating costs and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Inherent in an Investment in Us

We may not generate sufficient available cash to support the payment of the minimum quarterly distribution to our shareholders.

Under our current cash distribution policy, we intend to make a minimum quarterly distribution to the holders of our Class A Shares of at least $0.30 per share, or $1.20 per share on an annualized basis, to the extent we have sufficient available cash after the establishment of cash reserves and the payment of costs and expenses, including reimbursements of expenses to our general partner. In order to support the payment of the minimum quarterly distribution, we must generate available cash (as defined in our partnership agreement) of approximately $62.3 million per quarter, or approximately $249.2 million per year, based on Chevron’s noncontrolling interest in us and the number of Class A Shares outstanding as of December 31, 2025. We may not generate sufficient available cash each quarter to support the payment of the minimum quarterly distribution. The amount of cash we can distribute on our Class A Shares principally depends upon the amount of cash we generate from our operations, which will fluctuate from quarter to quarter based on, among other things:

In addition, the actual amount of available cash we generate will also depend on other factors, some of which are beyond our control, including:

Our general partner and its affiliates, including our Sponsor, have conflicts of interest with us and limited fiduciary duties to us and our shareholders, and they may favor their own interests to our detriment and that of our shareholders. Additionally, we have no control over the business decisions and operations of our Sponsor, and our Sponsor is not under any obligation to adopt a business strategy that favors us.

Our Sponsor indirectly owns and controls our general partner. Although our general partner has a duty to manage the Company in a manner that is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders, the Company’s directors and officers also have a duty to manage our general partner in a manner that is in the best interests of its owner, HIP GP LLC, which is owned by our Sponsor. Conflicts of interest may arise between the Sponsor and its respective affiliates, including our general partner, on the one hand, and the Company and the Company’s shareholders, on the other hand. In resolving these conflicts, our general partner may favor its own interests and the interests of its affiliates, including our Sponsor, over the interests of the Company’s shareholders. These conflicts include, among others, the following situations:

Under the terms of our partnership agreement, the doctrine of corporate opportunity, or any analogous doctrine, does not apply to our general partner or any of its affiliates, including our Sponsor, HIP GP LLC or the executive officers and directors of the Company. Any such person or entity that becomes aware of a potential transaction, agreement, arrangement or other matter that may be an opportunity for the Company will not have any duty to communicate or offer such opportunity to the Company. Any such person or entity will not be liable to the Company or to any limited partner for breach of any fiduciary duty or other duty by reason of the fact that such person or entity pursues or acquires such opportunity for itself, directs such opportunity to another person or entity or does not communicate such opportunity or information to the Company. This may create actual and potential conflicts of interest between the Company and affiliates of our general partner and result in less than favorable treatment of the Company and its shareholders.

Our partnership agreement requires that we distribute all of our available cash, which could limit our ability to grow and make acquisitions.

Our partnership agreement requires that we distribute all of our available cash to our shareholders. As a result, we expect to rely primarily upon external financing sources, including borrowings under our revolving credit facility and the issuance of debt and equity securities, to fund our acquisitions and expansion projects. Therefore, to the extent we are unable to finance our growth externally, our cash distribution policy will significantly impair our ability to grow. In addition, because we will distribute all of our available cash, our growth may not be as fast as that of businesses that reinvest their available cash to expand ongoing operations. To the extent we issue additional shares in connection with any acquisitions or expansion projects, the payment of distributions on those additional shares may increase the risk that we will be unable to maintain or increase our per share distribution level. There are no limitations in our partnership agreement on our ability to issue additional shares, including shares ranking senior to our Class A Shares as to distributions or in liquidation or that have special voting rights and other rights, and our shareholders will have no preemptive or other rights (solely as a result of their status as shareholders) to purchase any such additional shares. The incurrence of additional commercial borrowings or other debt to finance our growth strategy would result in increased interest expense, which, in turn, may reduce the amount of cash that we have available to distribute to our shareholders.

Our partnership agreement designates the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware as the exclusive forum for certain types of actions and proceedings that may be initiated by the Company’s shareholders, which would limit such shareholders’ ability to choose the judicial forum for disputes with us or our general partner’s directors, officers or other employees.

Our partnership agreement provides that, with certain limited exceptions, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware shall be the exclusive forum for any claims, suits, actions or proceedings (i) arising out of or relating in any way to our partnership agreement (including any claims, suits or actions to interpret, apply or enforce the provisions of our partnership agreement or the duties, obligations or liabilities among partners or of partners to the Company, or the rights or powers of, or restrictions on, the partners or the Company), (ii) brought in a derivative manner on behalf of the Company, (iii) asserting a claim of breach of a duty (including any fiduciary duty) owed by any director, officer, or other employee of the Company or our general partner, or owed by our general partner, to the Company or its partners, (iv) asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act (the “Delaware Act”) or (v) asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine. However, the exclusive forum provision would not apply to suits brought to enforce any liability or duty created by the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Exchange Act or any other claim for which the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction. To the extent that any such claims may be based upon federal law claims, Section 27 of the Exchange Act creates exclusive federal jurisdiction over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. Furthermore, Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in Class A Shares is deemed to have received notice of and consented to the foregoing provisions. Although we believe this choice of forum provision benefits the Company by providing increased consistency in the application of Delaware law in the types of lawsuits to which it applies, the provision may have the effect of discouraging lawsuits against the Company and our general partner’s directors and officers. The enforceability of similar choice of forum provisions in other companies’ certificates of incorporation or similar governing documents has been challenged in legal proceedings and it is possible that in connection with any action a court could find the choice of forum provisions contained in our partnership agreement to be inapplicable or unenforceable in such action. If a court were to find this choice of forum provision inapplicable to, or unenforceable in respect of, one or more of the specified types of actions or proceedings, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such matters in other jurisdictions, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to make cash distributions to our shareholders.

Our partnership agreement provides that our shareholders irrevocably waive the right to trial by jury in any claim, suit, action or proceeding under either state or federal laws, including any claim under U.S. federal securities laws, which could result in less favorable outcomes to our shareholders in any such action.

Our partnership agreement provides that our shareholders, including those who become our shareholders by purchasing shares in us in secondary transactions, irrevocably waive the right to trial by jury for any claims, suits, actions or proceedings (i) arising out of or relating in any way to our partnership agreement (including any claims, suits or actions to interpret, apply or enforce the provisions of our partnership agreement or the duties, obligations or liabilities among the Company’s partners, or obligations or liabilities of the Company’s partners to the Company, or the rights or powers of, or restrictions on, the Company’s partners or the Company), (ii) brought in a derivative manner on the Company’s behalf, (iii) asserting a claim of breach of a duty owed by any of the Company’s, or our general partner’s, directors, officers, or other employees, or owed by our general partner, to the Company or the Company’s partners, (iv) asserting a claim against the Company arising pursuant to any provision of the Delaware Act or (v) asserting a claim against the Company governed by the internal affairs doctrine, in each case pursuant to either state or federal laws, including U.S. federal securities law. Regardless, such waiver of the right to trial by jury does not impact the ability of a shareholder of the Company to make a claim under either federal or state law.

The waiver of the right to a jury trial is not intended to be deemed a waiver by any shareholder with respect to the Company’s compliance with U.S. federal securities laws and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. If the Company or one of the Company shareholders opposed a jury trial demand based on the waiver, the applicable court would determine whether the waiver was enforceable based on the facts and circumstances of that case in accordance with applicable state and federal laws. To our knowledge, the enforceability of a contractual pre-dispute jury trial waiver in connection with claims arising under the U.S. federal securities laws has not been finally adjudicated by the United States Supreme Court. However, we believe that a contractual pre-dispute jury trial waiver provision is generally enforceable, including under the laws of the State of Delaware, which govern our partnership agreement.

If a shareholder brings a claim in connection with matters arising under our partnership agreement, including claims under U.S. federal securities laws, such Company shareholder may not be entitled to a jury trial with respect to such claims, which may have the effect of limiting and discouraging lawsuits. If a lawsuit is brought by a shareholder under our partnership agreement, it may be heard only by a judge or justice of the applicable trial court, which would be conducted according to different civil procedures and may result in a different outcome than a trial by jury, including results that could be less favorable to the Company shareholder(s) bringing such lawsuit.

Affiliates of our general partner, including our Sponsor, may compete with us, and neither our general partner nor its affiliates have any obligation to present business opportunities to us.

Neither our partnership agreement nor the partnership agreement of the Partnership prohibits our Sponsor or any other affiliates of our general partner from owning assets or engaging in businesses that compete directly or indirectly with the Company. Under the terms of our partnership agreement, the doctrine of corporate opportunity, or any analogous doctrine, does not apply to our general partner or any of its affiliates, including our Sponsor and the Company’s executive officers and directors. Any such entity that becomes aware of a potential transaction, agreement, arrangement or other matter that may be an opportunity for the Company will not have any duty to communicate or offer such opportunity to the Company. Consequently, our Sponsor and other affiliates of our general partner, including HIP GP LLC, may acquire, construct or dispose of additional midstream assets in the future without any obligation to offer the Company the opportunity to purchase any of those assets. As a result, competition from our Sponsor and other affiliates of our general partner could materially and adversely impact the Company’s results of operations and available cash.

Our partnership agreement replaces our general partner’s fiduciary duties to holders of the Company’s shares with contractual standards governing its duties.

Delaware law provides that Delaware limited partnerships may, in their partnership agreements, expand, restrict or eliminate the fiduciary duties otherwise owed by the general partner to limited partners and the partnership, provided that partnership agreements may not eliminate the implied contractual covenant of good faith and fair dealing. As permitted by Delaware law, our partnership agreement contains provisions that eliminate the fiduciary standards to which our general partner would otherwise be held by state fiduciary duty law and replaces those duties with several different contractual standards. For example, our partnership agreement permits our general partner to make a number of decisions in its individual capacity, as opposed to in its capacity as our general partner, free of any duties to us and our shareholders other than the implied contractual covenant of good faith and fair dealing. This provision entitles our general partner to consider only the interests and factors that it desires and relieves it of any duty or obligation to give any consideration to any interest of, or factors affecting, us, our affiliates or our limited partners. By purchasing a Class A Share, a shareholder is treated as having consented to the provisions in our partnership agreement, including the provisions discussed above.

Holders of our Class A Shares have very limited voting rights and, even if they are dissatisfied, they cannot currently remove our general partner without its consent.

Unlike the holders of common stock in a corporation, our shareholders have only limited voting rights on matters affecting our business and, therefore, limited ability to influence management’s decisions regarding our business. For example, unlike holders of stock in a public corporation, our shareholders do not have “say-on-pay” advisory voting rights. Our shareholders did not elect our general partner and will not elect any of the members of our general partner’s board of directors and have no right to elect our general partner or any of the members of our general partner’s board of directors on an annual or other continuing basis. Our board of directors is chosen by HIP GP LLC, which is controlled by our Sponsor. Furthermore, if our shareholders are dissatisfied with the performance of our general partner, they have little ability to remove our general partner. As a result of these limitations, the price at which Class A Shares trade could be diminished because of the absence or reduction of a takeover premium in the trading price.

Our shareholders are not able to remove our general partner without its consent because our general partner and its affiliates own sufficient shares to be able to prevent its removal. In addition, our general partner may only be removed for cause. “Cause” is narrowly defined under our partnership agreement to mean that a court of competent jurisdiction has entered a final, non-appealable judgment finding our general partner liable for actual fraud or willful or wanton misconduct in its capacity as our general partner. Cause does not include most cases of charges of poor management of the business. Even if cause for removal exists, the vote of the holders of at least 66 2/3% of all of our outstanding shares voting together as a single class is required to remove our general partner. As of December 31, 2025, our general partner and its affiliates collectively owned approximately 37.9% of the outstanding Class B Shares and the Class A Shares, considered as a single class.

Furthermore, our shareholders’ voting rights are further restricted by our partnership agreement, which provides that any shares held by a person that owns 20% or more of any class of shares then outstanding, other than our general partner, its affiliates, their transferees, and persons who acquired such shares with the prior approval of our board of directors, cannot vote on any matter.

Our partnership agreement also contains provisions limiting the ability of our shareholders to call meetings or to acquire information about our operations, as well as other provisions limiting our shareholders’ ability to influence the manner or direction of management.

Our general partner interest or the control of our general partner may be transferred to a third party without shareholder consent.

Our general partner may transfer its general partner interest to a third party in a merger or in a sale of all or substantially all of its assets without the consent of our shareholders. Furthermore, there is no restriction in our partnership agreement on the ability of HIP GP LLC to transfer all of the partnership interests in our general partner, or all of the membership interests in GP LLC, the general partner of our general partner, to a third party. The new owner of our general partner or the general partner of our general partner would then be in a position to replace our board of directors and officers with its own choices. As a result, we could lose the provision of certain operational support and administrative services by Chevron and its affiliates and our license to use certain Hess trademarks.

Our general partner has a limited call right that may require our shareholders to sell their Class A Shares at an undesirable time or price.

If at any time our general partner and its affiliates, including our Sponsor, own more than 80% of the issued and outstanding limited partner interests of any class, our general partner will have the right, but not the obligation, which it may assign to any of its affiliates or to us, to acquire all, but not less than all, of the limited partner interests of such class held by unaffiliated persons at a price not less than their then-current market price. As a result, our shareholders may be required to sell their Class A Shares at an undesirable time or price and may not receive any return on their investment. Our shareholders may also incur a tax liability upon a sale of their Class A Shares. For purposes of this calculation, the Class B Shares will be considered collectively with the Class A Shares as a single class.

Our partnership agreement restricts the remedies available to shareholders for actions taken by our general partner that might otherwise constitute breaches of fiduciary duty.

Our partnership agreement contains provisions that restrict the remedies available to shareholders for actions taken by our general partner that might otherwise constitute breaches of fiduciary duty under state fiduciary duty law. For example, our partnership agreement:

The market price of Class A Shares may fluctuate significantly.

The market price of Class A Shares may fluctuate significantly, and holders of Class A Shares could lose some or all of the value of their investment. In addition, the stock market has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations in recent times which, if they continue to occur, could have a material adverse effect on the market for, or liquidity of, Class A Shares, regardless of our actual operating performance.

Our Sponsor may sell Class A Shares in the public or private markets, and such sales could have an adverse impact on the trading price of the Class A Shares.

As of December 31, 2025, our Sponsor and its affiliates collectively held 449,000 Class A Shares, 78,283,296 Class B Shares, and 78,283,296 Class B Units in the Partnership. The Class B Units in the Partnership are exchangeable, together with an equal number of Class B Shares, into Class A Shares on a one-to-one basis. We have agreed to provide our Sponsor with certain registration rights under applicable securities laws with respect to resales of the Class A Shares. The sale of these Class A Shares in the public or private markets could have an adverse impact on the price of the Class A Shares or any trading market that may develop.

We may issue an unlimited number of additional equity interests without shareholder approval, including equity interests with preferences senior to the Class A Shares, which would dilute shareholder interests.

Under our partnership agreement, we may, at any time, issue an unlimited number of general partner interests or limited partner interests of any type without the approval of our shareholders, and our shareholders will have no preemptive or other rights (solely as a result of their status as shareholders) to purchase any such general partner interests or limited partner interests. Further, there are no limitations in our partnership agreement on our ability to issue equity securities that rank equal or senior to the Class A Shares as to distributions or in liquidation or that have special voting rights and other rights.

The issuance by us of additional Class A Shares or other equity securities of equal or senior rank will have the following effects:

The issuance by us of additional general partner interests may have the following effects, among others, if such general partner interests are issued to a person who is not an affiliate of our general partner:

The NYSE does not require a publicly traded limited partnership like us to comply with certain of its corporate governance requirements.

Our Class A Shares are listed on the NYSE. Because we are a publicly traded limited partnership, the NYSE does not require us to have a majority of independent directors on our board of directors or to establish a compensation committee or a nominating and corporate governance committee. Additionally, any future issuances of additional Class A Shares or other securities, including to affiliates, are not subject to the NYSE’s shareholder approval rules that apply to a corporation. Accordingly, our shareholders do not have the same protections afforded to certain shareholders of corporations that are subject to all of the NYSE corporate governance requirements.

We are treated as a corporation for U.S. federal and state income tax purposes.

We are subject to U.S. federal income tax as a corporation at the current corporate tax rate of 21% and to state income tax in various states at various rates. Government action could result in tax increases retroactively or prospectively through tax claims, changes to applicable statutory tax rates, modification of the tax base, or imposition of new tax types. Distributions on our Class A Shares are treated as distributions on corporate stock for U.S. federal income tax purposes and taxed again as corporate dividends (to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits). Because an entity-level tax is imposed on us due to our status as a corporation for U.S. federal and state income tax purposes, available cash will be reduced by any tax liabilities.

On August 16, 2022, the United States enacted the Inflation Reduction Act, which includes a 15% corporate alternative minimum tax on corporations with average adjusted financial statement income over $1 billion for any 3-year period ending with 2022 or later and a 1% excise tax on the fair market value of stock that is repurchased by publicly traded U.S. corporations. The alternative minimum tax and the excise tax are effective in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2022. From time to time since enactment, the Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service have issued interim guidance and proposed regulations related to the corporate alternative minimum tax. We will continue to evaluate the effect of the law, including any changes to proposed regulations or the issuance of final regulations, on our future cash flows and financial results. We expect to be a payer of the corporate alternative minimum tax in future years, and available cash will be reduced by any tax liabilities attributable to the corporate alternative minimum tax.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Although we may, from time to time, be involved in litigation and claims arising out of our operations in the normal course of business, we are not a party to any litigation or governmental or other proceeding that we believe will have a material adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations. Pursuant to Item 103(c)(3)(iii) of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act, we are required to disclose certain information about environmental proceedings to which a governmental authority is a party if we reasonably believe such proceedings may result in monetary sanctions, exclusive of interest and costs, above a stated threshold. We have elected to apply a threshold of $1 million for purposes of determining whether disclosure of any such proceedings is required. See Note 11, Commitments and Contingencies for additional details.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not Applicable

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related SHAREholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Stock Market Information

Our Class A Shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange and are traded under the symbol “HESM”.

Holders

As of December 31, 2025, there were 194 shareholders of record who owned a total of 129,403,244 of our Class A Shares, one of which is HINDL. The number of holders does not include the holders for whom shares are held in a “nominee” or “street” name. In addition, as of December 31, 2025, HINDL owned an aggregate of 78,283,296 Class B Shares. Chevron indirectly owns the Class A Shares and Class B Shares owned by HINDL.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

In 2017, the Partnership adopted the Hess Midstream Partners LP 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan. Pursuant to the Restructuring, the Company assumed the Hess Midstream Partners LP 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan and all obligations with respect to outstanding awards thereunder. The Company amended and restated the Hess Midstream Partners LP 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan to, among other things, change the plan’s name to the Hess Midstream LP 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”) and to reflect the Company’s assumption of the plan. The LTIP limits the number of shares that may be delivered pursuant to vested awards to 3,000,000 Class A Shares.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table summarizes information about our equity compensation plan as of December 31, 2025:

Distributions of Available Cash

General

Our partnership agreement requires that, within 45 days after the end of each quarter, we distribute all of our available cash to shareholders of record on the applicable record date. Except for splits and combinations as contemplated by our partnership agreement, no distribution shall be made under any circumstances in respect of any Class B Shares or our general partner interest.

The following table sets forth the cash distributions per share declared on the Class A Shares, for the three most recent years through December 31, 2025:

Definition of Available Cash

Available cash generally means, for any quarter, all cash and cash equivalents on hand at the end of that quarter:

The purpose and effect of the last bullet point above is to allow our general partner, if it so decides, to use cash from working capital borrowings made after the end of the quarter but on or before the date of determination of available cash for that quarter to pay distributions to shareholders. Under our partnership agreement, working capital borrowings are generally borrowings that are made under a credit facility, commercial paper facility or similar financing arrangement, and in all cases are used solely for working capital purposes or to pay distributions to partners and with the intent of the borrower to repay such borrowings within twelve months with funds other than from additional working capital borrowings.

Intent to Distribute the Minimum Quarterly Distribution

Under our current cash distribution policy, we intend to make a minimum quarterly distribution to the holders of our Class A Shares of $0.30 per share, or $1.20 per share on an annualized basis, to the extent we have sufficient available cash after the establishment of cash reserves and the payment of costs and expenses, including reimbursements of expenses to our general partner. However, there is no guarantee that we will pay the minimum quarterly distribution on our Class A Shares in any quarter. The amount of distributions paid under our cash distribution policy and the decision to make any distribution will be determined by our general partner, taking into consideration the terms of our partnership agreement.

General Partner Interest

Our general partner owns a non-economic general partner interest in us. Our general partner is not entitled to receive cash distributions with respect to its general partner interest in us; however, our general partner may in the future own other equity interests in us and may be entitled to receive distributions on any such interests.

Adjustment of the Minimum Quarterly Distribution

If we combine our shares or other interests in us (“Company Interests”) into fewer shares or Company Interests (commonly referred to as a “reverse split”) or subdivide our shares or Company Interests into a greater number of shares or Company Interests (commonly referred to as a “split”), we will proportionately adjust the minimum quarterly distribution.

For example, if a two-for-one split of Class A Shares should occur, the minimum quarterly distribution would be reduced to 50% of its initial level. We will not make any adjustment by reason of the issuance of additional shares or Company Interests for cash or property (including additional Class A Shares issued under any compensation or benefit plans).

ITEM 6. [RESERVED]

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10‑K.

Unless otherwise stated or the context otherwise indicates, references in this report to “Hess Midstream LP,” “the Company,” “us,” “our,” “we” or similar terms refer to Hess Midstream LP, including its consolidated subsidiaries. References to “Partnership” refer to Hess Midstream Operations LP. References to “Sponsor” or “Sponsors” refer to (a) Hess Corporation (“Hess”) and GIP II Blue Holding, L.P. (“GIP”) when referring to periods prior to May 30, 2025, (b) Hess from May 30, 2025 to July 17, 2025, and (c) Chevron from July 18, 2025.

As used in this report, the term “Chevron” may refer to Chevron Corporation, one or more of its consolidated subsidiaries, or to all of them taken as a whole. All of these terms are used for convenience only and are not intended as a precise description of any of the separate companies, each of which manages its own affairs.

This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed below. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those identified below and those discussed in the section entitled “Risk Factors” included elsewhere in this report.

Overview

Organization

We are a fee-based, growth-oriented, limited partnership that owns, operates, develops and acquires a diverse set of midstream assets and provides fee-based services to our Sponsor, its subsidiaries, and third-party customers. Our assets are primarily located in the Bakken and Three Forks shale plays in the Williston Basin area of North Dakota, which we collectively refer to as the Bakken.

We are managed and controlled by Hess Midstream GP LLC (“GP LLC”), the general partner of our general partner. Prior to May 30, 2025, the general partner of our general partner was owned 50/50 by affiliates of Hess and GIP. As described below, as of the closing of the May 2025 GIP equity offering transaction, GIP no longer holds any Class A Shares of the Company or any Class B Units of the Partnership and no longer holds a direct or indirect ownership interest in GP LLC, our general partner, the Company, or the Partnership. From May 30, 2025 to July 17, 2025, the general partner of our general partner was wholly owned by Hess.

Chevron Merger

On July 18, 2025, Hess and Chevron completed the previously announced merger contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 22, 2023 (the “Merger”). As a result of the Merger, Chevron is the direct parent of Hess and, therefore, indirectly owns 100% of the limited liability company interests in GP LLC, 100% of the partnership interests in our general partner, and an approximate 37.9% interest in the Company on a consolidated basis.

Our historical commercial, omnibus and employee secondment agreements with Hess remain in effect subsequent to the Merger, and we refer to Chevron as the counterparty to these agreements as, following the completion of the Merger, Chevron wholly owns the Hess entities that are the counterparties to these agreements.

Operational Highlights

We substantially completed our multi-year projects to expand our compression capacity to support Chevron’s and third parties’ production in the Bakken. In 2025, we added approximately 20 MMcf/d of net compression capacity. Construction was also completed on an additional greenfield compressor station, which was placed in service in early 2026 and which further increased compression capacity by approximately 50 MMcf/d in 2026.

Equity Transactions

During 2025, the Company, the Partnership and the Sponsors completed the following equity transactions:

In 2025, GIP received net proceeds from the offerings of approximately $1.0 billion after deducting underwriting discounts. The Company did not receive any proceeds in the offerings.

The repurchase transactions described above were funded using borrowings under the Partnership’s existing revolving credit facility.

The ASR transactions described above were funded using borrowings under the Partnership’s existing revolving credit facility. See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. Note 3, Equity Transactions, Note 7, Debt and Interest Expense and Note 8, Partners’ Capital and Distributions.

At December 31, 2025:

Credit Ratings

On July 24, 2025 (the “Investment Grade Rating Date”), the Partnership received an investment grade rating from S&P Global Ratings (“S&P”). S&P assigned a rating of ‘BBB-’ to the Partnership’s unsecured debt and raised the Partnership’s issuer level credit rating to ‘BBB-’, with a stable outlook. As a result of this investment grade rating, the Partnership is not required to comply with certain restrictive covenants set forth in the unsecured notes indentures. Additionally, as a result of the investment grade rating, certain restrictive covenants on the Partnership’s Credit Facilities fell away and became more permissive. Following the release of collateral due to the investment grade rating, Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”) upgraded the Partnership’s senior unsecured notes to ‘Ba1’ and reaffirmed the stable outlook. At December 31, 2025, the Partnership’s senior unsecured debt is rated ‘BBB-’ by S&P, ‘BB+’ by Fitch Ratings, and ‘Ba1’ by Moody’s.

Income Taxes

On July 4, 2025, An Act to Provide for Reconciliation Pursuant to Title II of H. Con. Res. 14 (the “Reconciliation Act”) was enacted into law in the U.S., providing for significant changes to U.S. Federal tax law. Under GAAP, the impact of tax law changes is recognized in the period of enactment. There was no material impact of the Reconciliation Act on our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2025, and we do not expect a material impact on our future results of operations or cash flows.

Business Strategies

Our principal business objective is to grow our business and available cash supported by fee-based contracts and disciplined financial strategy. We expect to achieve this objective through the following business strategies:

Business Environment and Outlook

Chevron supports a global approach to governments addressing climate change and continues to take actions to help lower the carbon intensity of its operations while continuing to meet the demand for energy. We play a critical role in progress toward this objective in the Bakken region, including our focus on natural gas capture through increased availability and reliability at our compressor stations, gathering and processing infrastructure, and enhanced communication and coordination with third-party gatherers.

Segments

Our assets and operations are organized into the following three reportable segments: (i) gathering, (ii) processing and storage and (iii) terminaling and export.

Gathering

Our gathering segment includes Hess North Dakota Pipelines Operations LP, or Gathering Opco, and Hess Water Services Holdings LLC, which own the following assets:

Processing and Storage

Our processing and storage segment includes Hess TGP Operations LP, or HTGP Opco, and Hess Mentor Storage Holdings LLC, or Mentor Holdings, which own the following assets, respectively:

Terminaling and Export

Our terminaling and export segment includes Hess North Dakota Export Logistics Operations LP, or Logistics Opco, which owns each of the following assets:

Significant 2025 Financial and Operating Results

Significant financial and operating results for the year ended December 31, 2025 include:

Revenues and other income in 2025 were $1,621.3 million, up from $1,495.5 million in 2024. The increase was attributable to $54.5 million higher physical volumes, $40.1 million higher tariff rates, $15.4 million higher revenues from services provided directly to third parties, $13.3 million higher pass-through revenues and $2.5 million attributable to minimum volume commitment (“MVC”) revenues that were previously deferred. Total operating costs and expenses in 2025 were $613.2 million, up from $576.5 million in the prior year. The increase was attributable to higher operating and maintenance expenses of $23.3 million, including higher pass-through costs, higher costs charged to us under our omnibus and employee secondment agreements and higher third-party processing and offload fees. Additionally, part of the increase was attributable to higher depreciation of $11.0 million and higher general and administrative expenses of $2.4 million. Income from equity investments in 2025 was $15.9 million, up from $14.0 million in 2024 primarily due to higher volumes processed at the LM4 plant. Interest expense, net of interest income, in 2025 was $225.6 million, up from $202.2 million in 2024, primarily attributable to new fixed-rate senior unsecured notes issued in 2024 and 2025. Income tax expense in 2025 was $113.8 million, up from $71.8 million in 2024, which was primarily driven by increased ownership of the Partnership by Hess Midstream LP following the equity offering and unit repurchase transactions in 2024 and 2025. As a result, consolidated net income increased $25.6 million and Adjusted EBITDA increased $102.0 million.

Throughput volumes increased 6% for gas processing, 6% for crude oil gathering, 5% for gas gathering, 5% for crude oil terminaling and 5% for water gathering, primarily due to higher Chevron and third-party production.

For additional discussion of the results of operations at the segment level, see “Results of Operations” below. For additional information regarding Adjusted EBITDA, our non‑GAAP financial measure, see “How We Evaluate Our Operations” and “Reconciliation of Non‑GAAP Financial Measure” below.

How We Generate Revenues

We generate substantially all of our revenues by charging fees for gathering, compressing and processing natural gas and fractionating NGLs; gathering, terminaling, loading and transporting crude oil and NGLs; storing and terminaling propane; and gathering and disposing of produced water. We have entered into long-term, fee-based commercial agreements with Chevron effective January 1, 2014, for oil and gas services agreements, and effective January 1, 2019, for water services agreements.

Except for the water services agreements and except for a certain gathering sub-system, as described below, each of our commercial agreements with Chevron had an initial 10-year term. We exercised our renewal options to extend each of these commercial agreements for one additional 10-year term effective January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2033. There were no changes to any provisions of the existing commercial agreements as a result of the exercise of the renewal options. For this gathering sub-system, the initial term is 15 years effective January 1, 2014, and the Secondary Term is 5 years. For the water services agreements the initial term is 14 years effective January 1, 2019, and the Secondary Term is 10 years. We have the sole option to renew these remaining agreements for their Secondary Term that is exercisable at a later date. Upon the expiration of the Secondary Term, if any, the agreements will automatically renew for subsequent one-year periods unless terminated by either party no later than 180 days prior to the end of the applicable Secondary Term.

These agreements include dedications covering substantially all of Chevron’s existing and future owned or controlled production in the Bakken, minimum volume commitments, inflation escalators and fee recalculation mechanisms, all of which are intended to provide us with cash flow stability and growth, as well as downside risk protection. In particular, Chevron’s minimum volume commitments under our commercial agreements provide minimum levels of cash flows and the fee recalculation mechanisms under the agreements allow fees to be adjusted annually to provide us with cash flow stability during the initial term of the agreements. Year 2023 was the final year of the annual rate redetermination process for the majority of our systems. During the Secondary Term of the agreements, the fee recalculation model is replaced by an inflation-based fee structure. See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. Note 4, Related Party Transactions for additional description of our commercial agreements.

Our revenues also include revenues from (i) third-party volumes contracted directly with us, (ii) third-party volumes contracted with Chevron and delivered to us under the commercial agreements with Chevron described above, and (iii) pass-through third-party rail transportation costs, third-party produced water trucking and disposal costs, electricity fees and certain other third-party fees, for which we recognize revenues in an amount equal to the costs. For the year ended December 31, 2025, our gas gathering and gas processing revenues comprised 77% of total affiliate revenues, excluding affiliate pass-through revenues. Together with Chevron, we are pursuing strategic relationships with third-party producers and other midstream companies with operations in the Bakken in order to maximize our utilization rates.

How We Evaluate Our Operations

Our management uses a variety of financial and operating metrics to analyze our operating results and profitability. These metrics include (i) volumes, (ii) operating and maintenance expenses and (iii) Adjusted EBITDA.

Volumes. The amount of revenues we generate primarily depends on the volumes of crude oil, natural gas, NGLs and produced water that we handle at our gathering, processing, terminaling, storage and disposal facilities. These volumes are affected primarily by the supply of and demand for crude oil, natural gas and NGLs in the markets served directly or indirectly by our assets, including changes in crude oil prices, which may further affect volumes delivered by Chevron. Although Chevron has committed to minimum volumes under our commercial agreements described above, our results of operations will be impacted by our ability to:

Operating and Maintenance Expenses. Our management seeks to maximize the profitability of our operations by effectively managing operating and maintenance expenses. These expenses are comprised primarily of costs charged to us under our omnibus agreement and employee secondment agreement, third‑party contractor costs, utility costs, insurance premiums, third‑party service provider costs, related property taxes and other non‑income taxes and maintenance expenses, such as expenditures to repair, refurbish and replace storage facilities and to maintain equipment reliability, integrity and safety. These expenses generally remain relatively stable across broad ranges of throughput volumes but can fluctuate from period to period depending on the mix of activities performed during that period and the timing of substantial expenses, such as gas plant turnarounds. We seek to manage our maintenance expenditures by scheduling periodic maintenance on our assets in order to minimize significant variability in these expenditures and minimize their impact on our cash flow.

Adjusted EBITDA. We define “Adjusted EBITDA” as reported net income (loss) before net interest expense, income tax expense (benefit), and depreciation and amortization, as further adjusted to eliminate the impact of certain items that we do not consider indicative of our ongoing operating performance, such as transaction costs, other income and other non‑cash and non‑recurring items, if applicable. We use Adjusted EBITDA to analyze our performance and liquidity.

Adjusted EBITDA is a non‑GAAP supplemental financial measure that management and external users of our consolidated financial statements, such as industry analysts, investors, lenders and rating agencies, may use to assess:

We believe that the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA provides useful information to investors in assessing our financial condition and results of operations. The GAAP measures most directly comparable to Adjusted EBITDA are net income (loss) and net cash provided by (used in) operating activities. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to GAAP net income (loss), income (loss) from operations, net cash provided by (used in) operating activities or any other measure of financial performance or liquidity presented in accordance with GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA has important limitations as an analytical tool because it excludes some but not all items that affect net income and net cash provided by operating activities. You should not consider Adjusted EBITDA in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Additionally, because Adjusted EBITDA may be defined differently by other companies in our industry, our definition of these measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies, thereby diminishing their utility.

Results of Operations

The following tables summarize our consolidated results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023. The variances between 2025 and 2024 are discussed in further detail following this overview (in millions, unless otherwise noted). A discussion of variances between 2024 and 2023 can be found in the “Results of Operations” section on page 61 of the Company’s 2024 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 27, 2025.